ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2018
Comparison between L-type and N/L-type calcium channel blockers in the regulation of home blood-pressure variability in elderly hypertensive patients.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anti-inflammatory potential of telmisartan compared to other antihypertensives: secondary outcomes from a randomized trial.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Trial
- Long-term effect of the perindopril/indapamide/amlodipine single-pill combination on left ventricular hypertrophy in outpatient hypertensive subjects.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2019Trial
- Novel Indices of Home Blood Pressure Variability and Hypertension-Mediated Organ Damage in Treated Hypertensive Patients.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2021Article
- Depiction of Physiological Homeostasis by Self-Coupled System and Its Significance.Frontiers in physiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent studies suggest that L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) contribute to reducing blood pressure (BP) variability. We investigated whether inhibition of the N-type calcium channel has an additional effect on BP variability by comparing the effect of L-type and L/N-type CCBs on home BP variability in elderly hypertensive patients. Twenty-six hypertensive patients (≥65 years) were subjected to repeated changes with the administration of amlodipine (L-type CCB) and cilnidipine (L/N-type CCB) every 2 months. They measured the home BP in the morning and evening, and the coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated. We measured the brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and urinary catecholamine excretion as an index of the arterial stiffness and sympathetic nerve activity, respectively. There was no difference in the effect of both drugs on the CV in the morning and evening, while amlodipine was associated with a modestly higher pulse rate and lower BP than cilnidipine. By comparing individual patient data for the CV with each drug, we found that higher urinary catecholamine excretion was associated with the effectiveness of cilnidipine over amlodipine in the BP variability in the morning, which was not the case in the evening. In contrast, lower baPWV was associated with the effectiveness of amlodipine over cilnidipine on BP variability in the evening. Lower baPWV was also associated with lower BP variability in the evening. Cilnidipine has a similar capacity as amlodipine in reducing home BP variability, but the underlying mechanisms in reducing BP variability may differ.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.