ArticleScientific reports2018
Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2019Pooled it
- A predictive nomogram for a failed trial of labor after cesarean: A retrospective cohort study.The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research · 2022Trial
- Prevalence of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section and its associated factors among women delivered in the university of Gondar comprehensive specialized referral hospital, Northwest Ethiopia.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- How the Mode of Delivery Is Influenced by Patient's Opinions and Risk-Informed Consent in Women with a History of Caesarean Section? Is Vaginal Delivery a Real Option after Caesarean Section?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Maternal circulating metabolic biomarkers and their prediction performance for gestational diabetes mellitus related macrosomia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Exosomal RNA Expression Profiles and Their Prediction Performance in Patients With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Macrosomia.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- Analysis of Maternal and Infant Outcomes and Related Factors of Vaginal Delivery of Second Pregnancy after Cesarean Section.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
- Mechanical ventilation characteristics and their prediction performance for the risk of moderate and severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia in infants with gestational age <30 weeks and birth weight <1,500 g.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- A prospective study of a new prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean section at a tertiary care centre.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complications of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section.Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery researchArticle
- Predictors of success of trial of labor after cesarean section: A nested case-control study at public hospitals in Eastern Ethiopia.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is an urgent need in China to better predict vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) to face the challenge of the second child policy. We aimed to validate a widely used VBAC prediction model (Grobman's model) and a modified version of this model in a Chinese population. In this retrospective cohort study, 444 women with one cesarean delivery and at least one subsequent attempt for a trial of labor in Nanjing, China were included. The considered potential VBAC predictors included Grobman's background variables and five new variables. Overall, a total of 370 women had VBAC, with a success rate of 83.3%. The new background variables "maternal height" and "estimated fetal weight" were considered as two additional predictors for VBAC. The AUC of Grobman's model was 0.831 (95%CI = 0.775-0.886) while the AUC of our modified model with two new variables added was 0.857 (sensitivity = 72.2%, specificity = 83.8%). However, the difference between the AUC of the two models was not significant (Z = -1.69, P = 0.091). We confirmed that Grobman's model was accepted in the Chinese population. A modified model that is supplemented with maternal height and estimated fetal weight needs to be further studied in the Chinese population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.