Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

In-situ visualization of sound-induced otolith motion using hard X-ray phase contrast imaging.

Tanja Schulz-Mirbach, Margie Olbinado, Alexander Rack, Alberto Mittone, Alberto Bravin, Roland R Melzer, Friedrich Ladich, Martin Heß

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tanja Schulz-MirbachLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department Biology II, Zoology, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Margie OlbinadoEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, ID19), 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Alexander RackEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, ID19), 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9486-3621
Alberto MittoneEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, ID17), 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000, Grenoble, France.
Alberto BravinEuropean Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, ID17), 71 Avenue des Martyrs, 38000, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6868-2755
Roland R MelzerBavarian State Collection of Zoology (ZSM), Münchhausenstraße 21, 81247, Munich, Germany.
Friedrich LadichUniversity of Vienna, Department of Behavioural Biology, Althanstraße 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria. friedrich.ladich@univie.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6836-4191
Martin HeßLudwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department Biology II, Zoology, Großhaderner Straße 2, 82152, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regarding the basics of ear structure-function relationships in fish, the actual motion of the solid otolith relative to the underlying sensory epithelium has rarely been investigated. Otolith motion has been characterized based on a few experimental studies and on approaches using mathematical modeling, which have yielded partially conflicting results. Those studies either predicted a simple back-and-forth motion of the otolith or a shape-dependent, more complex motion. Our study was designed to develop and test a new set-up to generate experimental data on fish otolith motion in-situ. Investigating the basic parameters of otolith motion requires an approach with high spatial and temporal resolution. We therefore used hard X-ray phase contrast imaging (XPCI). We compared two anatomically well-studied cichlid species, Steatocranus tinanti and Etroplus maculatus, which, among other features, differ in the 3D shape of their otoliths. In a water-filled tank, we presented a pure tone of 200 Hz to 1) isolated otoliths embedded in agarose serving as a simple model or 2) to a fish (otoliths in-situ). Our new set-up successfully visualized the motion of otoliths in-situ and therefore paves the way for future studies evaluating the principles of otolith motion.

Identifiers

PMID29449570
PMCPMC5814409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.