Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449548›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2018

Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.

V K Stauffer, M M Luedi, P Kauf, M Schmid, M Diekmann, K Wieferich, B Schnüriger, D Doll

4 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03949140 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Laser Hair Removal for Primary Treatment of Pilonidal Disease Requiring Surgical Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2019 to 2021Enrolled22ConditionsPilonidal DiseaseArmsLaser hair removal
NCT04423510 completednot on this map

Previously Operated Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Treated With Crystallized Phenol: Twenty Years Experience

TypeobservationalSponsorOsman DOĞRURan1995 to 2016Enrolled227ConditionsPilonidal SinusArmsCrystallized phenol treatment
NCT04599517 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Most Frequently Preferred Surgical Method In The Treatment Of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Disease; Multicenter Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKonya Meram State HospitalRan2020 to 2020Enrolled6,748ConditionsPilonidal Sinus
NCT05474911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized comparative clinical study between two treatment strategies in patients with pilonidal sinus: conventional care versus negative pressure therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastiano BiondoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Wound HealArmsNegative pressure therapy, Conventional wound care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Guideline
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Effectiveness of topical use of LietofixTechniques in coloproctology · 2019
    Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

V K StaufferLindenhofspital, Lindenhofgruppe, 3010, Bern, (VS), Switzerland.
M M LuediDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Bern University Hospital Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, (MML), Switzerland.
P KaufBiomedical Statistics PROGNOSIX AG, 8001, Zurich, (PK, MS), Switzerland.
M SchmidBiomedical Statistics PROGNOSIX AG, 8001, Zurich, (PK, MS), Switzerland.
M DiekmannDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Vechta, Teaching Hospital of the Hannover University, 49377, Vechta, (KW, DD), Germany.
K WieferichDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Vechta, Teaching Hospital of the Hannover University, 49377, Vechta, (KW, DD), Germany.
B SchnürigerDepartment of Visceral Surgery and Medicine, Bern University Hospital Inselspital, University of Bern, 3010, Bern, (BS), Switzerland.
D DollDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marien-Krankenhaus Vechta, Teaching Hospital of the Hannover University, 49377, Vechta, (KW, DD), Germany. ddoll@gmx.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We systematically searched available databases. We reviewed 6,143 studies published from 1833 to 2017. Reports in English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish were considered, as were publications in other languages if definitive treatment and recurrence at specific follow-up times were described in an English abstract. We assessed data in the manner of a meta-analysis of RCTs; further we assessed non-RCTs in the manner of a merged data analysis. In the RCT analysis including 11,730 patients, Limberg & Dufourmentel operations were associated with low recurrence of 0.6% (95%CI 0.3-0.9%) 12 months and 1.8% (95%CI 1.1-2.4%) respectively 24 months postoperatively. Analysing 89,583 patients from RCTs and non-RCTs, the Karydakis & Bascom approaches were associated with recurrence of only 0.2% (95%CI 0.1-0.3%) 12 months and 0.6% (95%CI 0.5-0.8%) 24 months postoperatively. Primary midline closure exhibited long-term recurrence up to 67.9% (95%CI 53.3-82.4%) 240 months post-surgery. For most procedures, only a few RCTs without long term follow up data exist, but substitute data from numerous non-RCTs are available. Recurrence in PSD is highly dependent on surgical procedure and by follow-up time; both must be considered when drawing conclusions regarding the efficacy of a procedure.

Indexed as

AftercareHumansMalePilonidal SinusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID29449548
PMCPMC5814421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.