Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449297›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Delivering safe and effective test-result communication, management and follow-up: a mixed-methods study protocol.

Maria R Dahm, Andrew Georgiou, Johanna I Westbrook, David Greenfield, Andrea R Horvath, Denis Wakefield, Ling Li, Ken Hillman, Patrick Bolton, Anthony Brown and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Can patients contribute to enhancing the safety and effectiveness of test-result follow-up? Qualitative outcomes from a health consumer workshop.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Maria R DahmCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8067-4600
Andrew GeorgiouCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Johanna I WestbrookCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David GreenfieldAustralian Institute of Health Service Management, University of Tasmania, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Andrea R HorvathFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Denis WakefieldFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Ling LiCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ken HillmanThe Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, SWS Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick BoltonSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Anthony BrownHealth Consumers New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Graham JonesFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert HerkesAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Robert LindemanNSW Health Pathology, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia.
Michael LeggMichael Legg & Associates, Bulli, New South Wales, Australia.
Meredith MakehamAustralian Digital Health Agency, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Daniel MosesFaculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia.
Dauda BadmusCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Craig CampbellCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rae-Anne HardieCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Julie LiCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Euan McCaugheyCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Gorkem SezginCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Judith ThomasCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nasir WabeCentre for Health Systems and Safety Research, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Macquarie University · AUNew South Wales Department of Health · AUUNSW Sydney · AUAustralian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care · AUAustralian Institute of Health and Welfare · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AUVision Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe failure to follow-up pathology and medical imaging test results poses patient-safety risks which threaten the effectiveness, quality and safety of patient care. The objective of this project is to: (1) improve the effectiveness and safety of test-result management through the establishment of clear governance processes of communication, responsibility and accountability; (2) harness health information technology (IT) to inform and monitor test-result management; (3) enhance the contribution of consumers to the establishment of safe and effective test-result management systems. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This convergent mixed-methods project triangulates three multistage studies at seven adult hospitals and one paediatric hospital in Australia.Study 1 adopts qualitative research approaches including semistructured interviews, focus groups and ethnographic observations to gain a better understanding of test-result communication and management practices in hospitals, and to identify patient-safety risks which require quality-improvement interventions.Study 2 analyses linked sets of routinely collected healthcare data to examine critical test-result thresholds and test-result notification processes. A controlled before-and-after study across three emergency departments will measure the impact of interventions (including the use of IT) developed to improve the safety and quality of test-result communication and management processes.Study 3 adopts a consumer-driven approach, including semistructured interviews, and the convening of consumer-reference groups and community forums. The qualitative data will identify mechanisms to enhance the role of consumers in test-management governance processes, and inform the direction of the research and the interpretation of findings. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been granted by the South Eastern Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee and Macquarie University. Findings will be disseminated in academic, industry and consumer journals, newsletters and conferences.

Indexed as

CommunicationDiagnostic ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalsPatient SafetyQuality ImprovementSafety ManagementAdultAnthropology, CulturalAustraliaChildCommunity ParticipationFocus GroupsHumansMedical InformaticsQuality Assurance, Health Careinformation technologypatient safetyquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID29449297
PMCPMC5829886
OpenAlexW2790654826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.