Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29449180›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Psychiatry2018

Effectiveness of systemic family therapy versus treatment as usual for young people after self-harm: a pragmatic, phase 3, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

David J Cottrell, Alexandra Wright-Hughes, Michelle Collinson, Paula Boston, Ivan Eisler, Sarah Fortune, Elizabeth H Graham, Jonathon Green, Allan O House, Michael Kerfoot and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing self-harm in adolescents: the RISA-IPD comprehensive synopsis.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  10. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  11. Trajectories of parent criticism across treatment for youth self-harm.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

David J CottrellLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. Electronic address: d.j.cottrell@leeds.ac.uk.
Alexandra Wright-HughesClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michelle CollinsonClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Paula BostonLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ivan EislerDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurological Science, Kings College London, London, UK.
Sarah FortuneLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth H GrahamClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Jonathon GreenDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Allan O HouseLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Michael KerfootDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
David W OwensLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Eirini-Christina SalonikiCentre for Health Services Studies and Personal Social Services Research Unit, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Mima SimicSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Fiona LambertLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Justine RothwellDivision of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sandy TubeufLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Amanda J FarrinClinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
University of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBKing's College London · GBRoyal Manchester Children's Hospital · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

Department of Health 07/33/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-harm in adolescents is common and repetition occurs in a high proportion of these cases. Scarce evidence exists for effectiveness of interventions to reduce self-harm.

methodsThis pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial of family therapy versus treatment as usual was done at 40 UK Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS) centres. We recruited young people aged 11-17 years who had self-harmed at least twice and presented to CAMHS after self-harm. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive manualised family therapy delivered by trained and supervised family therapists or treatment as usual by local CAMHS. Participants and therapists were aware of treatment allocation; researchers were masked. The primary outcome was hospital attendance for repetition of self-harm in the 18 months after group assignment. Primary and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered at the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN59793150.

findingsBetween Nov 23, 2009, and Dec 31, 2013, 3554 young people were screened and 832 eligible young people consented to participation and were randomly assigned to receive family therapy (n=415) or treatment as usual (n=417). Primary outcome data were available for 795 (96%) participants. Numbers of hospital attendances for repeat self-harm events were not significantly different between the groups (118 [28%] in the family therapy group vs 103 [25%] in the treatment as usual group; hazard ratio 1·14 [95% CI 0·87-1·49] p=0·33). Similar numbers of adverse events occurred in both groups (787 in the family therapy group vs 847 in the treatment as usual group).

interpretationFor adolescents referred to CAMHS after self-harm, having self-harmed at least once before, our family therapy intervention conferred no benefits over treatment as usual in reducing subsequent hospital attendance for self-harm. Clinicians are therefore still unable to recommend a clear, evidence-based intervention to reduce repeated self-harm in adolescents.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

Indexed as

Family TherapyAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSelf-Injurious BehaviorSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29449180
PMCPMC5835764
OpenAlexW2786348565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.