Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29448967›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2018

Facial nerve stimulation in normal pigs and healthy human volunteers: transitional development of a medical device for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke.

Olivia Sanchez, Andrea García, Fernando Castro-Prado, Miriam Perez, Rafael Lara-Estrada, Martin Ramirez-Meza, Montserrat Godinez, Michael L Coco, Joaquín Azpiroz, Mark K Borsody and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation for the treatment of cerebrovascular ischemia.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2025
    Review
  4. A Pilot Study of Facial Nerve Stimulation on Cerebral Artery Vasospasm in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia SanchezNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Andrea GarcíaNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Fernando Castro-PradoCentral Norte Pemex, Hospital Angeles Pedregal, Mexico City, Mexico.
Miriam PerezNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Rafael Lara-EstradaNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Martin Ramirez-MezaNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Montserrat GodinezNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Michael L CocoNeuroSpring, 8 The Green, Dover, DE, 19901, USA.
Joaquín AzpirozNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mark K BorsodyNeuroSpring, 8 The Green, Dover, DE, 19901, USA. mborsody@neurospring.org.
Emilio SacristánNational Center for Medical Imaging and Instrumentation Research, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Mexico City, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana · MXPemex (Mexico) · MX

Funding

CONACyT 222241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMagnetic stimulation of the facial nerve has been tested in preclinical studies as a new, non-invasive emergency treatment of ischemic stroke that acts by increasing cerebral blood flow (CBF). The objective of the studies reported herein was to identify minimal stimulation parameters that increase CBF in large animals and then test those stimulation parameters in healthy volunteers for safety, tolerability, and effectiveness at increasing CBF. This translational research is necessary preparation for clinical studies in ischemic stroke patients.

methodsInitial experiments in anesthetized Yorkshire pigs were undertaken in order to identify the lowest stimulus power and duration that increase CBF. A full 3 × 3 factorial design was used to evaluate magnetic stimulation of the facial nerve at various stimulation powers (1.3, 1.6, and 1.9 Tesla field strength at coil surface) and for various durations (2, 3.5, and 5 min). CBF was measured with contrast MRI perfusion imaging and the internal carotid arteries were assessed with MR angiography. Magnetic facial nerve stimulation with parameters identified in the pig study was then applied to 35 healthy volunteers. Safety was assessed with adverse event reports and by medical examination. Tolerability was defined as each volunteer's ability to withstand at least 2 min of stimulation. Volunteers could determine the maximum power of stimulation they received during a ramp-up period.

resultsIn pigs, unilateral facial nerve stimulation increased CBF by as much as 77% over pre-stimulation baseline when administered across a range of 1.3-1.9 Tesla power and for 2- to 5-min duration. No clear dose-response relationship could be observed across this range, but lower powers and durations than these were markedly less effective. The effect of a single stimulation lasted 90 min. A second stimulation delivered 100 min after the first stimulation sustained the increased CBF without evidence of tachyphylaxis. In human, bilateral facial nerve stimulation caused only non-serious adverse events that were limited to the 2-min stimulation period. Tolerability was greatly improved by gentle encouragement from the study staff, which enabled most volunteers to tolerate 1.6-1.8 Tesla of stimulation power. CBF measures taken approximately 10 min after stimulation demonstrated on average a 32 ± 6% increase in CBF, with ≥ 25% increases in CBF occurring in 10 of the 31 volunteers who had adequate CBF measurements.

conclusionsThe minimal effective stimulation parameters defined by increased CBF, as identified in the pig study, translated into safe, tolerable, and effective stimulation of healthy volunteers. These results support the future development and evaluation of non-invasive facial nerve stimulation for the emergency treatment of ischemic stroke. Trial Registration retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov NRV_P1_01_15 on June 6, 2017.

Indexed as

Emergency TreatmentEquipment and SuppliesHealthy VolunteersAdultAnimalsBrain IschemiaCarotid ArteriesCerebrovascular CirculationFacial NerveFemaleHumansMagneticsMalePerfusionStrokeSwineCerebral blood flowFacial nerveIschemic strokeMagnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29448967
PMCPMC5815230
OpenAlexW2796715447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.