Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29448939›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

EXPOsOMICS: final policy workshop and stakeholder consultation.

Michelle C Turner, Paolo Vineis, Eduardo Seleiro, Michaela Dijmarescu, David Balshaw, Roberto Bertollini, Marc Chadeau-Hyam, Timothy Gant, John Gulliver, Ayoung Jeong and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Global research trends on the human exposome: a bibliometric analysis (2005-2024).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Air Pollution from Global Health to Individual Risk Factor-Is It Time forInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Semantic standards of external exposome data.Environmental research · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Clinical Applications of System Regulation Medicine.Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Michelle C TurnerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Paolo VineisMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG, London, UK. p.vineis@imperial.ac.uk.
Eduardo SeleiroInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Michaela DijmarescuMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG, London, UK.
David BalshawNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Roberto BertolliniFormer WHO Chief Scientist and Representative to the European Union, Brussels, Belgium.
Marc Chadeau-HyamMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG, London, UK.
Timothy GantPublic Health England, London, UK.
John GulliverMRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, W2 1PG, London, UK.
Ayoung JeongUniversity of Basel, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Soterios KyrtopoulosNational Hellenic Research Association, Athens, Greece.
Marco MartuzziWorld Health Organisation, Bonn, Germany.
Gary W MillerEmory University, Atlanta, USA.
Timothy NawrotUniversity of Hasselt, Hasselt, Belgium.
Mark NieuwenhuijsenBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
David H PhillipsKing's College London, London, UK.
Nicole Probst-HenschUniversity of Basel, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Jonathan SametColorado School of Public Health, Aurora, USA.
Roel VermeulenUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Jelle VlaanderenUtrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Martine VrijheidBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Christopher WildInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Manolis KogevinasBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
EXPOsOMICS Consortium

Funding

EC FP7 308610Medical Research Council MR/L01341X/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The final meeting of the EXPOsOMICS project "Final Policy Workshop and Stakeholder Consultation" took place 28-29 March 2017 to present the main results of the project and discuss their implications both for future research and for regulatory and policy activities. This paper summarizes presentations and discussions at the meeting related with the main results and advances in exposome research achieved through the EXPOsOMICS project; on other parallel research initiatives on the study of the exposome in Europe and in the United States and their complementarity to EXPOsOMICS; lessons learned from these early studies on the exposome and how they may shape the future of research on environmental exposure assessment; and finally the broader implications of exposome research for risk assessment and policy development on environmental exposures. The main results of EXPOsOMICS in relation to studies of the external exposome and internal exposome in relation to both air pollution and water contaminants were presented as well as new technologies for environmental health research (adductomics) and advances in statistical methods. Although exposome research strengthens the scientific basis for policy development, there is a need in terms of showing added value for public health to: improve communication of research results to non-scientific audiences; target research to the broader landscape of societal challenges; and draw applicable conclusions. Priorities for future work include the development and standardization of methodologies and technologies for assessing the external and internal exposome, improved data sharing and integration, and the demonstration of the added value of exposome science over conventional approaches in answering priority policy questions.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthHealth PolicyAir PollutionBiomedical ResearchCongresses as TopicEnvironmental ExposureEuropeHumansRisk AssessmentStakeholder ParticipationWater PollutionAdductomicsAir pollutionExposomeExternal exposomeInternal exposomePolicyStatisticsWater contaminationWorkshop report

Identifiers

PMID29448939
PMCPMC5815236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.