Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29447391›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2018

Comparative Analysis of Epidermal Differentiation Genes of Crocodilians Suggests New Models for the Evolutionary Origin of Avian Feather Proteins.

Karin Brigit Holthaus, Bettina Strasser, Julia Lachner, Supawadee Sukseree, Wolfgang Sipos, Anton Weissenbacher, Erwin Tschachler, Lorenzo Alibardi, Leopold Eckhart

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karin Brigit HolthausResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Bettina StrasserResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Julia LachnerResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Supawadee SuksereeResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang SiposClinical Department for Farm Animals and Herd Management, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Austria.
Anton WeissenbacherVienna Zoo, Vienna, Austria.
Erwin TschachlerResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Lorenzo AlibardiDipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche ed Ambientali (BiGeA), University of Bologna, Italy.
Leopold EckhartResearch Division of Biology and Pathobiology of the Skin, Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 23801Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermis of amniotes forms a protective barrier against the environment and the differentiation program of keratinocytes, the main cell type in the epidermis, has undergone specific alterations in the course of adaptation of amniotes to a broad variety of environments and lifestyles. The epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) is a cluster of genes expressed at late stages of keratinocyte differentiation in both sauropsids and mammals. In the present study, we identified and analyzed the crocodilian equivalent of the EDC. The gene complement of the EDC of both the American alligator and the saltwater crocodile were determined by comparative genomics, de novo gene prediction and identification of EDC transcripts in published transcriptome data. We found that crocodilians have an organization of the EDC similar to that of their closest living relatives, the birds, with which they form the clade Archosauria. Notable differences include the specific expansion of a subfamily of EDC genes in crocodilians and the loss of distinct ancestral EDC genes in birds. Identification and comparative analysis of crocodilian orthologs of avian feather proteins suggest that the latter evolved by cooption and sequence modification of ancestral EDC genes, and that the amplification of an internal highly cysteine-enriched amino acid sequence motif gave rise to the feather component epidermal differentiation cysteine-rich protein in the avian lineage. Thus, sequence diversification of EDC genes contributed to the evolutionary divergence of the crocodilian and avian integuments.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEpidermisFeathersAlligators and CrocodilesAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsBase SequenceBirdsCell DifferentiationFemaleSyntenyTurtlesalligatorscomparative genomicscrocodilesfeathersintegumentskin

Identifiers

PMID29447391
PMCPMC5827346
OpenAlexW2791548565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.