ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2018
Salzburg Global Seminar Session 565-'Better Health Care: how do we learn about improvement?'
Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Do Quality Improvement Initiatives Improve Outcomes for Patients in Antiretroviral Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries? A Systematic Review.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2019Pooled it
- The Irish national chronic obstructive pulmonary disease quality improvement collaborative: an adaptive learning collaborative.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- Translating evidence in complex systems: a comparative review of implementation and improvement frameworks.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019Review
- Successful Healthcare Improvements From Translating Evidence in complex systems (SHIFT-Evidence): simple rules to guide practice and research.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2019Article
- A framework for learning about improvement: embedded implementation and evaluation design to optimize learning.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Reinstatement · 2018-02-16Date of Article and/or Notice Unknown · Error by Journal/Publisher · Removed · Retract and Replace · Temporary Removal · · article retracted and reinstated unknown date/reasons (1/29/22 AJA);
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A fundamental question for the field of healthcare improvement is the extent to which the results achieved can be attributed to the changes that were implemented and whether or not these changes are generalizable. Answering these questions is particularly challenging because the healthcare context is complex, and the interventions themselves tend to be complex and multi-dimensional. The Salzburg Global Seminar Session 565-'Better Health Care: How do we learn about improvement?' was convened to address questions of attribution, generalizability and rigor, and to think through how to approach these concerns in the field of quality improvement. The Salzburg Global Seminar Session 565 brought together 61 leaders in improvement from 22 countries, including researchers, evaluators and improvers. The primary conclusion that resulted from the session was the need for evaluation to be embedded as an integral part of the improvement. We have invited participants of the seminar to contribute to writing this supplement, which consists of eight articles reflecting insights and learning from the Salzburg Global Seminar. This editorial serves as an introduction to the supplement. The supplement explains results and insights from Salzburg Global Seminar Session 565.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.