Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29447287›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Strain-specific quantification of root colonization by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus firmus I-1582 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713 in non-sterile soil and field conditions.

Hajeewaka C Mendis, Varghese P Thomas, Patrick Schwientek, Rauf Salamzade, Jung-Ting Chien, Pramuditha Waidyarathne, Joseph Kloepper, Leonardo De La Fuente

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
18.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Harnessing NativeApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Biology · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hajeewaka C MendisDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.
Varghese P ThomasCrop Science Division, Biologics, Bayer, West Sacramento, CA, United States of America.
Patrick SchwientekCrop Science Division, Biologics, Bayer, West Sacramento, CA, United States of America.
Rauf SalamzadeCrop Science Division, Biologics, Bayer, West Sacramento, CA, United States of America.
Jung-Ting ChienCrop Science Division, Biologics, Bayer, West Sacramento, CA, United States of America.
Pramuditha WaidyarathneCentre for Advanced Computational Solutions, Lincoln University, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Joseph KloepperDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.
Leonardo De La FuenteDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-4840
Bayer (United States) · USAuburn University · USLincoln University · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens QST713 and B. firmus I-1582 are bacterial strains which are used as active ingredients of commercially-available soil application and seed treatment products Serenade® and VOTiVO®, respectively. These bacteria colonize plant roots promoting plant growth and offering protection against pathogens/pests. The objective of this study was to develop a qPCR protocol to quantitate the dynamics of root colonization by these two strains under field conditions. Primers and TaqMan® probes were designed based on genome comparisons of the two strains with publicly-available and unpublished bacterial genomes of the same species. An optimized qPCR protocol was developed to quantify bacterial colonization of corn roots after seed treatment. Treated corn seeds were planted in non-sterile soil in the greenhouse and grown for 28 days. Specific detection of bacteria was quantified weekly, and showed stable colonization between ~104-105 CFU/g during the experimental period for both bacteria, and the protocol detected as low as 103 CFU/g bacteria on roots. In a separate experiment, streptomycin-resistant QST713 and rifampicin-resistant I-1582 strains were used to compare dilution-plating on TSA with the newly developed qPCR method. Results also indicated that the presence of natural microflora and another inoculated strain does not affect root colonization of either one of these strains. The same qPCR protocol was used to quantitate root colonization by QST713 and I-1582 in two corn and two soybean varieties grown in the field. Both bacteria were quantitated up to two weeks after seeds were planted in the field and there were no significant differences in root colonization in either bacteria strain among varieties. Results presented here confirm that the developed qPCR protocol can be successfully used to understand dynamics of root colonization by these bacteria in plants growing in growth chamber, greenhouse and the field.

Indexed as

Bacillus amyloliquefaciensBacillus firmusSoilPlant DevelopmentPlant RootsSeedsZea maysSoil

Identifiers

PMID29447287
PMCPMC5814090
OpenAlexW2793128671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.