ArticlePloS one2018
A mass-density model can account for the size-weight illusion.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A meta-analysis of the size-weight and material-weight illusions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Pooled it
- The size-weight illusion and beyond: A new model of perceived weight.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- New evidence for the sensorimotor mismatch theory of weight perception and the size-weight illusion.Experimental brain research · 2024Article
- No evidence for a difference in Bayesian reasoning for egocentric versus allocentric spatial cognition.PloS one · 2024Article
- Mass distribution and shape influence the perceived weight of objects.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Visual experience shapes the Bouba-Kiki effect and the size-weight illusion upon sight restoration from congenital blindness.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The cost of aiming for the best answers: Inconsistent perception.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023Review
- Size, weight, and expectations.Perception · 2022Article
- Familiarity with an Object's Size Influences the Perceived Size of Its Image.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Article
- Dynamic size-weight changes after object lifting reduce the size-weight illusion.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Memory influences haptic perception of softness.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- When Does One Decide How Heavy an Object Feels While Picking It Up?Psychological science · 2019Article
- The material-weight illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- The influence of size in weight illusions is unique relative to other object features.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2019Review
- Influence of visually perceived shape and brightness on perceived size, expected weight, and perceived weight of 3D objects.PloS one · 2019Article
- Low-level sensory processes play a more crucial role than high-level cognitive ones in the size-weight illusion.PloS one · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
When judging the heaviness of two objects with equal mass, people perceive the smaller and denser of the two as being heavier. Despite the large number of theories, covering bottom-up and top-down approaches, none of them can fully account for all aspects of this size-weight illusion and thus for human heaviness perception. Here we propose a new maximum-likelihood estimation model which describes the illusion as the weighted average of two heaviness estimates with correlated noise: One estimate derived from the object's mass, and the other from the object's density, with estimates' weights based on their relative reliabilities. While information about mass can directly be perceived, information about density will in some cases first have to be derived from mass and volume. However, according to our model at the crucial perceptual level, heaviness judgments will be biased by the objects' density, not by its size. In two magnitude estimation experiments, we tested model predictions for the visual and the haptic size-weight illusion. Participants lifted objects which varied in mass and density. We additionally varied the reliability of the density estimate by varying the quality of either visual (Experiment 1) or haptic (Experiment 2) volume information. As predicted, with increasing quality of volume information, heaviness judgments were increasingly biased towards the object's density: Objects of the same density were perceived as more similar and big objects were perceived as increasingly lighter than small (denser) objects of the same mass. This perceived difference increased with an increasing difference in density. In an additional two-alternative forced choice heaviness experiment, we replicated that the illusion strength increased with the quality of volume information (Experiment 3). Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which seems promising as a starting point for a unifying framework for the size-weight illusion and human heaviness perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.