Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29447168›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Quantitative proteome profile of water deficit stress responses in eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) leaves.

Paul E Abraham, Benjamin J Garcia, Lee E Gunter, Sara S Jawdy, Nancy Engle, Xiaohan Yang, Daniel A Jacobson, Robert L Hettich, Gerald A Tuskan, Timothy J Tschaplinski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Anti-Inflammatory Activity ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul E AbrahamChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2685-9123
Benjamin J GarciaBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Lee E GunterBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Sara S JawdyBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Nancy EngleBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Xiaohan YangBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Daniel A JacobsonBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Robert L HettichChemical Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Gerald A TuskanBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Timothy J TschaplinskiBiosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States of America.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought stress is a recurring feature of world climate and the single most important factor influencing agricultural yield worldwide. Plants display highly variable, species-specific responses to drought and these responses are multifaceted, requiring physiological and morphological changes influenced by genetic and molecular mechanisms. Moreover, the reproducibility of water deficit studies is very cumbersome, which significantly impedes research on drought tolerance, because how a plant responds is highly influenced by the timing, duration, and intensity of the water deficit. Despite progress in the identification of drought-related mechanisms in many plants, the molecular basis of drought resistance remains to be fully understood in trees, particularly in poplar species because their wide geographic distribution results in varying tolerances to drought. Herein, we aimed to better understand this complex phenomenon in eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides) by performing a detailed contrast of the proteome changes between two different water deficit experiments to identify functional intersections and divergences in proteome responses. We investigated plants subjected to cyclic water deficit and compared these responses to plants subjected to prolonged acute water deficit. In total, we identified 108,012 peptide sequences across both experiments that provided insight into the quantitative state of 22,737 Populus gene models and 8,199 functional protein groups in response to drought. Together, these datasets provide the most comprehensive insight into proteome drought responses in poplar to date and a direct proteome comparison between short period dehydration shock and cyclic, post-drought re-watering. Overall, this investigation provides novel insights into drought avoidance mechanisms that are distinct from progressive drought stress. Additionally, we identified proteins that have been associated as drought-relevant in previous studies. Importantly, we highlight the RD26 transcription factor as a gene regulated at both the transcript and protein level, regardless of species and drought condition, and, thus, represents a key, universal drought marker for Populus species.

Indexed as

ProteomeStress, PhysiologicalChromatography, LiquidDroughtsPlant ProteinsPopulusTandem Mass SpectrometryPlant ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID29447168
PMCPMC5813909
OpenAlexW2792168849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.