Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29447165›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Comparison of three data mining models for prediction of advanced schistosomiasis prognosis in the Hubei province.

Guo Li, Xiaorong Zhou, Jianbing Liu, Yuanqi Chen, Hengtao Zhang, Yanyan Chen, Jianhua Liu, Hongbo Jiang, Junjing Yang, Shaofa Nie

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Nomogram for Predicting Prognosis of AdvancedTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Predictive Models for the Medical Diagnosis of Dengue: A Case Study in Paraguay.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Guo LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiaorong ZhouHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jianbing LiuHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuanqi ChenDepartment of Mathematics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Hengtao ZhangDepartment of Mathematics, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yanyan ChenHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Jianhua LiuYichang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Yichang, Hubei, China.
Hongbo JiangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junjing YangHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Shaofa NieDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4591-4469

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to better assist medical professionals, this study aimed to develop and compare the performance of three models-a multivariate logistic regression (LR) model, an artificial neural network (ANN) model, and a decision tree (DT) model-to predict the prognosis of patients with advanced schistosomiasis residing in the Hubei province. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsSchistosomiasis surveillance data were collected from a previous study based on a Hubei population sample including 4136 advanced schistosomiasis cases. The predictive models use LR, ANN, and DT methods. From each of the three groups, 70% of the cases (2896 cases) were used as training data for the predictive models. The remaining 30% of the cases (1240 cases) were used as validation groups for performance comparisons between the three models. Prediction performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Univariate analysis indicated that 16 risk factors were significantly associated with a patient's outcome of prognosis. In the training group, the mean AUC was 0.8276 for LR, 0.9267 for ANN, and 0.8229 for DT. In the validation group, the mean AUC was 0.8349 for LR, 0.8318 for ANN, and 0.8148 for DT. The three models yielded similar results in terms of accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Predictive models for advanced schistosomiasis prognosis, respectively using LR, ANN and DT models were proved to be effective approaches based on our dataset. The ANN model outperformed the LR and DT models in terms of AUC.

Indexed as

ChinaData MiningDecision TreesEpidemiological MonitoringFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk FactorsROC CurveSchistosomiasis

Identifiers

PMID29447165
PMCPMC5831639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.