Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29446994›Full record

Trial reportJournal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)2018

"It's Better in a Group Anyway": Patient Experiences of Group and Individual Acupuncture.

Elizabeth Chuang, Noa Hashai, Michele Buonora, Jonathan Gabison, Benjamin Kligler, M Diane McKee

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluating the outcomes and patient experience of group and individual acupuncture in an NHS cancer care setting: a mixed-methods study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Group versus Individual Acupuncture (AP) for Cancer Pain: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth Chuang1 Department of Family and Social Medicine, Palliative Care Service, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY.
Noa Hashai2 Karolinska Institutet Medical School , Solna, Sweden .
Michele Buonora3 Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY.
Jonathan Gabison3 Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY.
Benjamin Kligler4 Coordinating Center for Integrative Health , U.S. Veterans Health Administration, Washinton, District of Columbia.
M Diane McKee5 Department of Family and Social Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine , Bronx, NY.

Funding

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute AD-1402-10857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChronic pain is prevalent, burdensome, and costly, and there are ethnic and racial disparities in treatment. Acupuncture is effective and safe, but access is limited. Group acupuncture can decrease cost and increase capacity by decreasing clinic space needs and increasing patient volume per acupuncturist; however, the effectiveness and patient acceptability of group and individual session acupuncture have never been directly compared.

designThe Acupuncture Approaches to Decrease Disparities in Pain Treatment (AADDOPT-2) study is a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of acupuncture for chronic pain. Semistructured in-depth interviews were conducted with a subset of patients enrolled in the trial. SETTINGS/LOCATION: Outpatient clinics in an urban, low income area serving a primarily black and Hispanic population. SUBJECTS: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 46 patients; 23 in each arm of the AADDOPT-2 study.

interventionsPatients were randomized to receive either individual acupuncture or acupuncture delivered in a small group. OUTCOME MEASURES: Transcripts of the interviews were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework to explore and compare the patient experience in group and individual settings.

resultsPatients in both study arms valued the pain relief, improved quality of life, and relaxation experienced during acupuncture. Privacy and mixed-sex groups were cited as a concern by a minority of patients; however, most of those randomized to the group setting noted that these concerns abated after initiating treatment. Differences between arms included the depth of the relationship with the acupuncturist and misgivings related to the treatment space. Group dynamics varied; some groups fostered a supportive, therapeutic interaction, while others were more reserved.

conclusionsPatients in both arms valued their acupuncture experience. Participants described both positive and negative aspects of the group setting.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyAdultAgedChronic PainFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPain Managementacupuncturechronic painmusculoskeletal painosteoarthritisqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID29446994
PMCPMC6179144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.