ArticleJournal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)2018
Mitigation of airways responsiveness by deep inflation of the lung.
Article in Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nocturnal bilevel positive airway pressure for the treatment of asthma.Respiratory physiology & neurobiology · 2020Trial
- Antenatal Endotoxin Induces Dysanapsis in Experimental Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2024Article
- Pulmonary consequences of experimentally induced stroke: differences between global and focal cerebral ischemia.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Stretching activated strips of airway smooth muscle (ASM) significantly affects both active force and stiffness due to a temporary reduction of the proportion of cycling myosin cross bridges that are bound to their actin binding sites. For the same reason, stretch applied to ASM in situ by a deep inflation (DI) of the lungs is one of the most potent means of reversing bronchoconstriction. When the DI is sufficiently large, however, and is applied while bronchoconstriction is in the process of developing, the subsequent depression in airway resistance is more persistent than can be attributed simply to temporary detachment of ASM cross bridges. In the present study, we use a computational model to demonstrate that this DI-induced ablation of airway responsiveness can be explained by a dose-dependent reduction in the number of cross bridges available to bind to actin when the ASM in the airway wall is stretched above a critical threshold strain and that this disruption of the contractile apparatus recovers over an order of magnitude longer time scale than that of the simple reattachment of unbound cross bridges. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The mechanisms by which deep inflation of the lung reverse bronchoconstriction and affect subsequent airway responsiveness have important potential implications for asthma, yet remain controversial. This study uses computational modeling to posit a mechanism by which sufficiently vigorous inflations applied during active bronchoconstriction not only transiently reverse bronchoconstriction, but also reduce subsequent airways responsiveness for a period of time. Fitting the model to published data in mice supports this notion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.