Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29446525›Full record

ReviewHaemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia2018

Laboratory testing for factor VIII and IX inhibitors in haemophilia: A review.

C H Miller

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Turning up the heat: optimizing Bethesda assays for efanesoctocog alfa monitoring.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. [Chinese guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hemophilia with inhibitors (2023)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Acquired Haemophilia A: A Review of What We Know.Journal of blood medicine · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Experience of Immune Tolerance Induction Therapy for Hemophilia A Patients with Inhibitors from a Single Center in India.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

C H MillerDivision of Blood Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3989-7973
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibitors are antibodies directed against haemophilia treatment products which interfere with their function. Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in haemophilia A and factor IX (FIX) inhibitors in haemophilia B are significant clinically when they require a change in a patient's treatment regimen. Their persistence may increase morbidity and mortality. Multiple laboratory tests are now available for detecting and understanding inhibitors in haemophilia. Inhibitors are traditionally measured by their interference in clotting or chromogenic factor assays. They may also be detected using immunologic assays, such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or fluorescence immunoassay. Anti-FVIII or anti-FIX antibodies of IgG

Indexed as

Factor IXFactor VIIIFemaleHemophilia AHumansMaleFactor IXFactor VIIIfactor IXfactor VIIIhaemophiliainhibitor

Identifiers

PMID29446525
PMCPMC6033270
OpenAlexW2793075683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.