Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29446460›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physical anthropology2018

A multivariate ecogeographic analysis of macaque craniodental variation.

Nicole D S Grunstra, Philipp Mitteroecker, Robert A Foley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physical anthropology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A multivariate ecogeographic analysis of macaque craniodental variation.American journal of physical anthropology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole D S GrunstraLeverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Cambridge CB2 1QH, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6708-2245
Philipp MitteroeckerDepartment of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria.
Robert A FoleyLeverhulme Centre for Human Evolutionary Studies, Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, University of Cambridge, The Henry Wellcome Building, Cambridge CB2 1QH, United Kingdom.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29397
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo infer the ecogeographic conditions that underlie the evolutionary diversification of macaques, we investigated the within- and between-species relationships of craniodental dimensions, geography, and environment in extant macaque species. We studied evolutionary processes by contrasting macroevolutionary patterns, phylogeny, and within-species associations. MATERIALS AND

methodsSixty-three linear measurements of the permanent dentition and skull along with data about climate, ecology (environment), and spatial geography were collected for 711 specimens of 12 macaque species and analyzed by a multivariate approach. Phylogenetic two-block partial least squares was used to identify patterns of covariance between craniodental and environmental variation. Phylogenetic reduced rank regression was employed to analyze spatial clines in morphological variation.

resultsBetween-species associations consisted of two distinct multivariate patterns. The first represents overall craniodental size and is negatively associated with temperature and habitat, but positively with latitude. The second pattern shows an antero-posterior tooth size contrast related to diet, rainfall, and habitat productivity. After controlling for phylogeny, however, the latter dimension was diminished. Within-species analyses neither revealed significant association between morphology, environment, and geography, nor evidence of isolation by distance. DISCUSSION: We found evidence for environmental adaptation in macaque body and craniodental size, primarily driven by selection for thermoregulation. This pattern cannot be explained by the within-species pattern, indicating an evolved genetic basis for the between-species relationship. The dietary signal in relative tooth size, by contrast, can largely be explained by phylogeny. This cautions against adaptive interpretations of phenotype-environment associations when phylogeny is not explicitly modelled.

Indexed as

AnimalsAsia, SoutheasternClimateEcosystemFemaleMacacaMaleMultivariate AnalysisPhylogenyRainSkullToothenvironmental gradientphylogenyrainfallspatial analysistemperature

Identifiers

PMID29446460
PMCPMC6492120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.