Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29446149›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2018

Distinction of the GABA 2.29 ppm resonance using triple refocusing at 3 T in vivo.

Vivek Tiwari, Zhongxu An, Yiming Wang, Changho Choi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Nature biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vivek TiwariAdvanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Zhongxu AnAdvanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.ORCID 0000-0003-3759-5645
Yiming WangAdvanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Changho ChoiAdvanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Clinical development of cancer-specific MRS biomarkers in malignant gliomasR01CA184584 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHOI, CHANGHO · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184584
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop

methodsTriple-refocusing was tailored at 3 T, with numerical simulations and phantom validation, for distinction of the GABA 2.29-ppm resonance from the neighboring glutamate resonance. The optimization was performed on the inter-RF pulse time delays and the duration and carrier frequency of a non-slice-selective RF pulse. The optimized triple refocusing was tested in multiple regions in 6 healthy subjects, including hippocampus. The in vivo spectra were analyzed with the LCModel using in-house basis spectra. After normalization of the metabolite signal estimates to water, the metabolite concentrations were quantified with reference to medial-occipital creatine at 8 mM.

resultsA triple-refocusing scheme with optimized inter-RF pulse time delays (TE = 74 ms) was obtained for GABA detection. With optimized duration (14 ms) and carrier frequency (4.5 ppm) of the non-slice-selective RF pulse, the triple refocusing gave rise to distinction between the GABA 2.29-ppm and glutamate 2.35-ppm signals. The GABA 2.29-ppm signal was clearly discernible in spectra in vivo (voxel size 4 to 12 mL; scan times 4.3 to 17 minutes). With a total of 24 spectra from 6 gray or white matter-dominant regions, the GABA concentration was measured to be 0.62 to 1.15 mM (Cramer-Rao lower bound of 8 to 14%), and the glutamate level 5.8 to 11.2 mM (Cramer-Rao lower bound of 3 to 6%).

conclusionThe optimized triple refocusing provided distinction between GABA and glutamate signals and permitted direct codetection of these metabolites in the human brain at 3 T in vivo.

Indexed as

AdultAspartic AcidBrainBrain ChemistryFemalegamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGlutamineHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhantoms, ImagingYoung AdultAspartic Acidgamma-Aminobutyric AcidGlutamic AcidGlutamineN-acetylaspartate1H MRS3 Tgray matterhuman braintriple refocusingγ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)

Identifiers

PMID29446149
PMCPMC6092256
OpenAlexW2792220308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.