ArticleMedical physics2018
A real-time method to simultaneously measure linear energy transfer and dose for proton therapy using organic scintillators.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of in situ dosimetry for FLASH proton radiotherapy via organic scintillating fibers.The British journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Time-resolved point dosimetry for spread-out Bragg-peak proton FLASH using fibre-coupled scintillators.Medical physics · 2026Article
- High-Density Glass Scintillators for Proton Radiography-Relative Luminosity, Proton Response, and Spatial Resolution.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Improved simultaneous LET and dose measurements in proton therapy.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Direct detection of 5-MeV protons by flexible organic thin-film devices.Science advances · 2021Article
- Dual-storage phosphor proton therapy dosimetry: Simultaneous quantification of dose and linear energy transfer.Medical physics · 2021Article
- Producing a Beam Model of the Varian ProBeam Proton Therapy System using TOPAS Monte Carlo Toolkit.Medical physics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCurrently, no detectors are capable of simultaneously measuring dose and linear energy transfer (LET) in real time. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of exploiting the difference in the response of various organic plastic scintillation detectors to measure LET and dose in therapeutic proton beams. The hypothesis behind this work was that the ratio of the responses of different scintillators exposed to the same proton beam can be used to obtain a LET vs ratio calibration curve that can then be used to infer LET under any other measurement conditions.
methodsWe first used similar scintillators with different ionization quenching factors. LET values for different irradiation conditions were calculated using a validated Monte Carlo model of the proton beam line. The quenching factors in the Birks equation for different scintillators as a function of LET were obtained from measurements in a 100-MeV pristine proton beam. We then used four different organic scintillation materials - polystyrene (BCF-12), poly (methyl methacrylate), polyvinyltoluene, and a liquid scintillator - for which the LET response varied with regard to not only quenching but also differences in material density and relative stopping power. We simultaneously exposed the four different organic scintillators and a plane-parallel ion chamber to passively scattered proton beams at fluence-averaged LET. Comparisons to the expected values obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations were made on the basis of both dose and LET.
resultsThe maximum difference in the quenching factor was 20%, resulting in a 5% change in LET with a response ratio over a range of 5 keV/μm. Among all the scintillators investigated, the ratio of PMMA to BCF-12 provided the best correlation with LET values and was therefore used to construct the LET calibration curve. The expected LET values in the validation set were within 2% ± 6%, which resulted in dose accuracy of 1.5% ± 5.8% for the range of LET values investigated in this work.
conclusionsWe demonstrated the feasibility of using the ratio of the light outputs of two organic scintillators to simultaneously measure LET and dose in therapeutic proton beams for fluence-averaged LET values from 0.47 to 1.26 keV/μm. Further studies are needed to verify the response for higher LET values and the reproducibility of this method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.