Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445944›Full record

ReviewJapanese journal of ophthalmology2018

Diagnosis and treatment of anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody positive optic neuritis.

Takeshi Kezuka, Hitoshi Ishikawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clinical features of adult patients with positive NMDAR-IgG coexisting with MOG-IgG.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Takeshi KezukaKEZUKA Eye Clinic, 1-5-7 Mukojima, Sumida-ku, Tokyo, 131-0033, Japan. tkezuka1000@gmail.com.
Hitoshi IshikawaDepartment of Orthoptics and Visual Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Kitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anti-myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody positive optic neuritis has been established as a new subset of optic neuropathy. Anti-MOG antibodies are usually measured by cell-based assay. Patients with anti-MOG antibody positive optic neuritis respond well to steroid therapy, and, while visual acuity outcomes are favorable, significant visual field defects remain. Furthermore, patients who are anti-MOG antibody positive have higher rates of recurrence compared to antibody negative patients. Based on these findings, anti-MOG antibody positive patients with optic neuritis have the characteristics of good visual outcomes, residual visual field defects, and high risk of recurrence. Tests for anti-MOG antibody are useful for the diagnosis and treatment of optic neuritis.

Indexed as

Aquaporin 4AutoantibodiesHumansImmunotherapyMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinOptic NeuritisVisual AcuityAquaporin 4AutoantibodiesMyelin-Oligodendrocyte GlycoproteinAnti-MOG antibodyAnti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodyChronic recurrent inflammatory optic neuropathyOptic neuritis

Identifiers

PMID29445944
OpenAlexW2793299920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.