Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445928›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2018

Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab, lapatinib, and paclitaxel neoadjuvant treatment with or without prolonged exposure to anti-HER2 therapy, and with or without hormone therapy for HER2-positive primary breast cancer: a randomised, five-arm, multicentre, open-label phase II trial.

N Masuda, M Toi, N Yamamoto, H Iwata, K Kuroi, H Bando, S Ohtani, T Takano, K Inoue, Y Yanagita and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

N MasudaDepartment of Surgery, Breast Oncology, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
M ToiDepartment of Surgery (Breast Surgery), Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. toi@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
N YamamotoDivision of Breast Surgery, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan.
H IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
K KuroiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
H BandoBreast and Endocrine Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
S OhtaniDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
T TakanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
K InoueDivision of Breast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
Y YanagitaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Gunma, Japan.
H KasaiInstitute for Advancement of Clinical and Translational Science, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
S MoritaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
T SakuraiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
S OhnoClinical Research Institute, NHO Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPKyoto University Hospital · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPChiba Cancer Center · JPGunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center · JPHiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPToranomon Hospital · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDual blockade of HER2 promises increased pathological complete response (pCR) rate compared with single blockade in the presence of chemotherapy for HER2-positive (+) primary breast cancer. Many questions remain regarding optimal duration of treatment and combination impact of endocrine therapy for luminal HER2 disease.

methodsWe designed a randomised phase II, five-arm study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lapatinib and trastuzumab (6 weeks) followed by lapatinib and trastuzumab plus weekly paclitaxel (12 weeks) with/without prolongation of anti-HER2 therapy prior to chemotherapy (18 vs. 6 weeks), and with/without endocrine therapy in patients with HER2+ and/or oestrogen receptor (ER)+ disease. The primary endpoint was comprehensive pCR (CpCR) rate. Among the secondary endpoints, pCR (yT0-isyN0) rate, safety, and clinical response were evaluated.

resultsIn total, 215 patients were enrolled; 212 were included in the full analysis set (median age 53.0 years; tumour size = T2, 65%; and tumour spread = N0, 55%). CpCR was achieved in 101 (47.9%) patients and was significantly higher in ER- patients than in ER+ patients (ER- 63.0%, ER+ 36.1%; P = 0.0034). pCR with pN0 was achieved in 42.2% of patients (ER- 57.6%, ER+ 30.3%). No significant difference was observed in pCR rate between prolonged exposure groups and standard groups. Better clinical response outcomes were obtained in the prolongation phase of the anti-HER2 therapy. No surplus was detected in pCR rate by adding endocrine treatment. No major safety concern was recognised by prolonging the anti-HER2 treatment or adding endocrine therapy.

conclusionsThis study confirmed the therapeutic impact of lapatinib, trastuzumab, and paclitaxel therapy for each ER- and ER+ subgroup of HER2+ patients. Development of further strategies and tools is required, particularly for luminal HER2 disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansLapatinibMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelQuinazolinesTrastuzumabTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesLapatinibPaclitaxelQuinazolinesTrastuzumabAnti-HER2 therapyLapatinibPaclitaxelPhase II studyTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID29445928
PMCPMC5996004
OpenAlexW2793039561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.