Trial reportWorld journal of urology2018
Prospective randomised controlled trial of written supplement to verbal communication of results to patients at the time of flexible cystoscopy.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of a patient-centred sleep study report in the management of obstructive sleep apnoea.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2022Trial
- Patient-centred pathology reporting improves patient experience and understanding of disease in prostate cancer care.BJUI compass · 2024Article
- Does postal consent for flexible cystoscopy work?Irish journal of medical science · 2022Article
- Development and design of a diagnostic report to support communication in dementia: Co-creation with patients and care partners.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis trial assessed if written information on procedural findings and subsequent treatment improved understanding and reduced anxiety among patients undergoing day case flexible cystoscopy (FC).
methodsParticipants completed pre- and post-procedure questionnaires self-rating anxiety and feeling well informed on 5-point Likert scales. Supplemental written information was provided after FC to half the patients on a standardized template, according to randomized allocation. Comparisons between the groups were undertaken using the Wilcoxon test.
resultsTwo hundred patients were recruited, with 171 evaluable questionnaires (83 from written group). The distribution of age, sex and prior FC, as well as the pre-procedure self-assessment of anxiety and understanding, was similar between the two groups. Patients receiving written information reported feeling better informed, with median (range) Likert score of 5 (4-5) compared to 4 (1-5) out of 5 (p < 0.0001) and less anxious (score 1 [1-4] compared to 2 [1-5] out of 5, p < 0.005), although all except four patients had an accurate understanding of the information provided (p = NS).
conclusionsWritten information at the time of FC leads to patients feeling better informed and less anxious, although verbal information alone appears to lead to an adequate understanding. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12616000288426.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.