Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445828›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

The neural circuits of number and letter copying: an fNIRS study.

Christina Artemenko, Andra Coldea, Mojtaba Soltanlou, Thomas Dresler, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, Ann-Christine Ehlis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christina ArtemenkoLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. christina.artemenko@uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5947-7960
Andra ColdeaSchool of Psychology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Mojtaba SoltanlouDepartment of Psychology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Thomas DreslerLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Hans-Christoph NuerkLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ann-Christine EhlisLEAD Graduate School & Research Network, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

DFG NU 265/3-1IZKF Tübingen 2115-0-0LEAD Graduate School and Research Network GSC1028Science Campus Tübingen Project 8.4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our daily lives, we are constantly exposed to numbers and letters. However, it is still under debate how letters and numbers are processed in the brain, while information on this topic would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of, for example, known influences of language on numerical cognition or neural circuits shared by numerical cognition and language processing. Some findings provide evidence for a double dissociation between numbers and letters, with numbers being represented in the right and letters in the left hemisphere, while the opposing view suggests a shared neural network. Since processing may depend on the task, we address the reported inconsistencies in a very basic symbol copying task using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). fNIRS data revealed that both number and letter copying rely on the bilateral middle and left inferior frontal gyri. Only numbers elicited additional activation in the bilateral parietal cortex and in the left superior temporal gyrus. However, no cortical activation difference was observed between copying numbers and letters, and there was Bayesian evidence for common activation in the middle frontal gyri and superior parietal lobules. Therefore, we conclude that basic number and letter processing are based on a largely shared cortical network, at least in a simple task such as copying symbols. This suggests that copying can be used as a control condition for more complex tasks in neuroimaging studies without subtracting stimuli-specific activation.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleFunctional LateralityFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMaleNerve NetReaction TimeSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultCopying taskfNIRSLetter processingNumber processing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.