Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445301›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2018

Comparative effectiveness of early-line

Reshma L Mahtani, Monika Parisi, Stefan Glück, Quanhong Ni, Siyeon Park, Corey Pelletier, Claudio Faria, Fadi Braiteh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Natural Taxanes: From Plant Composition to Human Pharmacology and Toxicity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Reshma L MahtaniDivision of Hematology/Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL.
Monika ParisiHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ.
Stefan GlückGlobal Medical Affairs, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ.
Quanhong NiHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ.
Siyeon ParkSchool of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Corey PelletierHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ.
Claudio FariaHealth Economics and Outcomes Research, Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ.
Fadi BraitehDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReal-world analyses of treatments for patients with metastatic breast cancer are limited. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness of

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study using fully de-identified data from an independent US electronic medical record platform of patients with metastatic breast cancer initiating single-agent

resultsThis analysis included 925 patients. Patients receiving

conclusion

Indexed as

hormone receptor positivemetastatic breast cancernab-paclitaxelpaclitaxeltriple negative

Identifiers

PMID29445301
PMCPMC5808700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.