Trial reportThe oncologist2018
Cabozantinib in Patients with Advanced Merkel Cell Carcinoma.
Trial report in The oncologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02036476 (Cabozantinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cabozantinib in Recurrent/Metastatic Merkel Cell Carcinoma
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Next-generation sequencing for guiding matched targeted therapies in people with relapsed or metastatic cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Merkel-cell carcinoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.ESMO open · 2024Guideline
- Cabozantinib for different endocrine tumours: killing two birds with one stone. A systematic review of the literature.Endocrine · 2024Pooled it
- Combined nivolumab and ipilimumab with or without stereotactic body radiation therapy for advanced Merkel cell carcinoma: a randomised, open label, phase 2 trial.Lancet (London, England) · 2022Trial
- C-MET tyrosine kinase receptor: mechanisms, clinical applications and future perspectives in cancer therapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Advancing Treatment Options for Merkel Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Tumor-Targeted Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Merkel cell carcinoma: updates in tumor biology, emerging therapies, and preclinical models.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Adjuvant Radiotherapy for Dissected Parotid Lymph Nodes Containing Merkel Cell Carcinoma from an Unknown Primary Skin Site: 2 Case Reports.The American journal of case reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Review
- Cabozantinib for the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2022Review
- An analysis of the use of targeted therapies in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma and an evaluation of genomic correlates of response.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2021Review
- Current concepts and approaches to merkel cell carcinoma.Archives of dermatological research · 2021Review
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma: An Immunotherapy Fairy-Tale?Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Case Report: Favorable Response to the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Apatinib in Recurrent Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Immune checkpoint blockade for Merkel cell carcinoma: actual findings and unanswered questions.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2019Review
- The biology and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: current understanding and research priorities.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study sought to determine the efficacy and safety profile of cabozantinib in patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). EXPERIMENTAL
designThis prospective, phase II, single-institution trial enrolled patients with platinum-failure, recurrent/metastatic MCC to receive cabozantinib 60 mg orally daily until disease progression, withdrawal from study, or severe toxicity. The primary endpoint was disease control rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. Immunohistochemistry for VEGFR-2, MET, and HGF expression and next-generation sequencing of tumor tissue were performed and correlated with outcome.
resultsEight patients were accrued from January 24, 2014, to June 8, 2016. The study was closed prematurely because of toxicity and lack of responses. The most frequent adverse events were grades 1 and 2 and included anorexia, fatigue, nausea, hypothyroidism, and dysgeusia. Two patients developed nonhealing, painful ulcers and tumor-skin fistula. One patient had stable disease for 8 months. One patient withdrew from the study after 2 weeks of therapy because of adverse events. Three patients required dose reduction because of toxicity. Median PFS and OS were 2.1 and 11.2 months, respectively. No expression of MET, HGF, or VEGFR-2 was identified in tumor cells by immunohistochemistry of patients' tissue samples.
conclusionCabozantinib was poorly tolerated and did not demonstrate activity in patients with recurrent/metastatic, platinum-failure MCC. It is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation or genetic alteration in the targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study. (Clinical trial identification number: NCT02036476) IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This phase II study demonstrated poor tolerability and lack of activity of cabozantinib in an unselected group of patients with advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Although it is unclear whether preselection of patients with the specific upregulation and genetic alterations in targets for cabozantinib would have changed the results of this study, this would have likely led to an extremely rare patient population that would take many years to accrue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.