Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445022›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Whole genome duplication and transposable element proliferation drive genome expansion in Corydoradinae catfishes.

Sarah Marburger, Markos A Alexandrou, John B Taggart, Simon Creer, Gary Carvalho, Claudio Oliveira, Martin I Taylor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mobile Elements in Ray-Finned Fish Genomes.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah MarburgerMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Markos A AlexandrouMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
John B TaggartInstitute of Aquaculture, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3843-9663
Simon CreerMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.
Gary CarvalhoMolecular Ecology and Fisheries Genetics Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9509-7284
Claudio OliveiraDepartamento de Morfologia, Instituto de Biociências/UNESP, Rua Professor Doutor Antonio Celso Wagner Zanin, s/n°18618-689 Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4143-7212
Martin I TaylorSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK martin.taylor@uea.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3858-0712

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size varies significantly across eukaryotic taxa and the largest changes are typically driven by macro-mutations such as whole genome duplications (WGDs) and proliferation of repetitive elements. These two processes may affect the evolutionary potential of lineages by increasing genetic variation and changing gene expression. Here, we elucidate the evolutionary history and mechanisms underpinning genome size variation in a species-rich group of Neotropical catfishes (Corydoradinae) with extreme variation in genome size-0.6 to 4.4 pg per haploid cell. First, genome size was quantified in 65 species and mapped onto a novel fossil-calibrated phylogeny. Two evolutionary shifts in genome size were identified across the tree-the first between 43 and 49 Ma (95% highest posterior density (HPD) 36.2-68.1 Ma) and the second at approximately 19 Ma (95% HPD 15.3-30.14 Ma). Second, restriction-site-associated DNA (RAD) sequencing was used to identify potential WGD events and quantify transposable element (TE) abundance in different lineages. Evidence of two lineage-scale WGDs was identified across the phylogeny, the first event occurring between 54 and 66 Ma (95% HPD 42.56-99.5 Ma) and the second at 20-30 Ma (95% HPD 15.3-45 Ma) based on haplotype numbers per contig and between 35 and 44 Ma (95% HPD 30.29-64.51 Ma) and 20-30 Ma (95% HPD 15.3-45 Ma) based on SNP read ratios. TE abundance increased considerably in parallel with genome size, with a single TE-family (TC1-IS630-Pogo) showing several increases across the Corydoradinae, with the most recent at 20-30 Ma (95% HPD 15.3-45 Ma) and an older event at 35-44 Ma (95% HPD 30.29-64.51 Ma). We identified signals congruent with two WGD duplication events, as well as an increase in TE abundance across different lineages, making the Corydoradinae an excellent model system to study the effects of WGD and TEs on genome and organismal evolution.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsEvolution, MolecularGene DuplicationGenome SizeAnimalsCatfishesPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA Transposable ElementsCorydorasgenome size evolutionpolyploidytransposable elementsWGD

Identifiers

PMID29445022
PMCPMC5829208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.