Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445019›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Wound treatment and selective help in a termite-hunting ant.

Erik T Frank, Marten Wehrhahn, K Eduard Linsenmair

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transcriptional predictors of rescue behaviour in ants.The Journal of experimental biology · 2026
    Article
  2. The Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Prosocial Behavior toward Others in Negative State.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Battles between ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Leg or antenna injury inCurrent zoology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Wound treatment and selective help in a termite-hunting ant.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Erik T FrankDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany erik.frank@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-2066-3202
Marten WehrhahnDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
K Eduard LinsenmairDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany.
Google (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Open wounds are a major health risk in animals, with species prone to injuries likely developing means to reduce these risks. We therefore analysed the behavioural response towards open wounds on the social and individual level in the termite group-hunting ant

Indexed as

GroomingPredatory BehaviorAnimalsAntsSocial Behaviormyrmecologyprosocial behaviourrescue behavioursocial immunity

Identifiers

PMID29445019
PMCPMC5829198
OpenAlexW2785560702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.