Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29445018›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2018

High rates of vessel noise disrupt foraging in wild harbour porpoises (

Danuta Maria Wisniewska, Mark Johnson, Jonas Teilmann, Ursula Siebert, Anders Galatius, Rune Dietz, Peter Teglberg Madsen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fin Whale (Ecology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Influence of vessel disturbance on Pacific harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena vomerina) echolocation.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Danuta Maria WisniewskaDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark danuta.wisniewska@bios.au.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-7440
Mark JohnsonSea Mammal Research Unit, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8424-3197
Jonas TeilmannDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-4376-4700
Ursula SiebertInstitute for Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Research, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buesum, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2556-3948
Anders GalatiusDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1237-2066
Rune DietzDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9652-317X
Peter Teglberg MadsenDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5208-5259
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shipping is the dominant marine anthropogenic noise source in the world's oceans, yet we know little about vessel encounter rates, exposure levels and behavioural reactions for cetaceans in the wild, many of which rely on sound for foraging, communication and social interactions. Here, we used animal-borne acoustic tags to measure vessel noise exposure and foraging efforts in seven harbour porpoises in highly trafficked coastal waters. Tagged porpoises encountered vessel noise 17-89% of the time and occasional high-noise levels coincided with vigorous fluking, bottom diving, interrupted foraging and even cessation of echolocation, leading to significantly fewer prey capture attempts at received levels greater than 96 dB re 1 µPa (16 kHz third-octave). If such exposures occur frequently, porpoises, which have high metabolic requirements, may be unable to compensate energetically with negative long-term fitness consequences. That shipping noise disrupts foraging in the high-frequency-hearing porpoise raises concerns that other toothed whale species may also be affected.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorShipsAnimalsDenmarkEcholocationNoisePhocoenaanthropogenic disturbancebehavioural responseDTAGexposure ratesfitness consequencesforaging

Identifiers

PMID29445018
PMCPMC5829196
OpenAlexW2785478860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.