ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2018
Data sharing in medical research.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using Mendelian randomization (STROBE-MR): a Korean translation of explanation and elaboration.Ewha medical journal · 2025Guideline
- Assessing the Evolution and Influence of Medical Open Databases on Biomedical Research and Health Care Innovation: A 25-Year Perspective With a Focus on Privacy and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Navigating the new NIH Data Management Sharing plan: the NIH HEAL Initiative Data2Action DMPTool template.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Parallel privacy preservation through partitioning (P4): a scalable data anonymization algorithm for health data.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Breaking the silence of sharing data in medical research.PloS one · 2024Article
- Sequential regression and simulation: a method for estimating causal effects from heterogeneous clinical trials without a common control group.BMC medical research methodology · 2023Article
- The five pillars of computational reproducibility: bioinformatics and beyond.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- A Multifaceted benchmarking of synthetic electronic health record generation models.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Quality Output Checklist and Content Assessment (QuOCCA): a new tool for assessing research quality and reproducibility.BMJ open · 2022Review
- Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomisation (STROBE-MR): explanation and elaboration.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Privacy-preserving data sharing infrastructures for medical research: systematization and comparison.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021Article
- Article
- Observational
- Sharing Is Caring-Data Sharing Initiatives in Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29444885What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.