Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29444711›Full record

SynthesisSystematic reviews2018

Information needs in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.

Lisa Biernatzki, Silke Kuske, Jutta Genz, Michaela Ritschel, Astrid Stephan, Christina Bächle, Sigrid Droste, Sandra Grobosch, Nicole Ernstmann, Nadja Chernyak and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Assessing patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications to inform shared decision-making: A best-worst scaling experiment in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lisa BiernatzkiInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. lisa-biernatzki@gmx.de.
Silke KuskeInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jutta GenzInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, German Diabetes Center (DDZ), Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research, at Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Auf'm Hennekamp 65, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michaela RitschelInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Astrid StephanInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Christina BächleInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sigrid DrosteInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Sandra GroboschInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nicole ErnstmannCenter for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Nadja ChernyakInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andrea IcksInstitute for Health Services Research and Health Economics, Centre for Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf 9772577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to identify and analyse currently available knowledge on information needs of people with diabetes mellitus, also considering possible differences between subgroups and associated factors.

methodsTwelve databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched up until June 2015. Publications that addressed self-reported information needs of people with diabetes mellitus were included. Each study was assessed by using critical appraisal tools, e.g. from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Extraction and content analysis were performed systematically.

resultsIn total, 1993 publications were identified and 26 were finally included. Nine main categories of information needs were identified, including 'treatment-process', 'course of disease', 'abnormalities of glucose metabolism' and 'diabetes through the life cycle'. Differences between patient subgroups, such as type of diabetes or age, were sparsely analysed. Some studies analysed associations between information needs and factors such as participation preferences or information seeking. They found, for example, that information needs on social support or life tasks were associated with information seeking in Internet forums.

conclusionInformation needs in people with diabetes mellitus, appear to be high, yet poorly investigated. Research is needed regarding differences between diverse diabetes populations, including gender aspects or changes in information needs during the disease course. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The review protocol has been registered at Prospero ( CRD42015029610 ).

Indexed as

Information Seeking BehaviorSocial SupportDiabetes MellitusHumansInternetQuality of LifeDiabetesInformation needsInformation-seeking behaviourSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29444711
PMCPMC5813383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.