Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29444687›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2018

Psychometric properties of the medical outcomes study: social support survey among methadone maintenance patients in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a validation study.

Long Quynh Khuong, Tuong-Vi Thi Vu, Van-Anh Ngoc Huynh, Truc Thanh Thai

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04706624 (Screen, Treat and Retain Meth-using People With Opioid Use Disorders at Methadone Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04706624 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Screen, Treat and Retain Meth-using People With Opioid Use Disorders at Methadone Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorHanoi Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled667ConditionsMethamphetamine Abuse, Opioid-use Disorder, HIV SeropositivityArmsContingency management (12 weeks), Contingency management (6 weeks), SMS reminders, Matrix only, Matrix + Contingency management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Long Quynh KhuongFaculty of Public Health, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 159 Hung Phu Street, Ward 8, District 8, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tuong-Vi Thi VuSouth Vietnam HIV- Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 15th Floor, Central Building, 217 Hong Bang, Ward 11, District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Van-Anh Ngoc HuynhFaculty of Public Health, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 159 Hung Phu Street, Ward 8, District 8, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Truc Thanh ThaiFaculty of Public Health, Ho Chi Minh City University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 159 Hung Phu Street, Ward 8, District 8, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. ThaiThanhTruc@ump.edu.vn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial support plays a crucial role in the treatment and recovery process of patients engaging in methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). However, there is a paucity of research about social support among MMT patients, possibly due to a lack of appropriate measuring tools. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Vietnamese version of the Medical Outcomes Study: Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) among MMT patients.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 300 patients was conducted in a methadone clinic in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. MMT patients who agreed to participate in the study completed a face-to-face interview in a private room. The MOS-SSS was translated into Vietnamese using standard forward-backward process. Internal consistency was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The intra-class correlation coefficient was used to determine the test-retest reliability of the MOS-SSS in 75 participants two weeks after the first survey. Concurrent validity of the MOS-SSS was evaluated by correlations with the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the Perceived Stigma of Addiction Scale (PSAS). Construct validity was investigated by confirmatory factor analysis.

resultsThe MOS-SSS had good internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha from 0.95 to 0.97 for the four subscales and 0.97 for the overall scale. The two-week test-retest reliability was at moderate level with intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.61-0.73 for the four subscales and 0.76 for the overall scale. Strong significant correlations between the MOS-SSS and the MSPSS (r = 0.77; p < 0.001) and the PSAS (r = - 0.76; p < 0.001) indicated good concurrent validity. Construct validity of the MOS-SSS was established since a final four-factor model fitted the data well with Comparative Fit Index (0.97), Tucker-Lewis Index (0.97), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (0.03) and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (0.068; 90% CI = 0.059-0.077).

conclusionsThe MOS-SSS is a reliable and valid tool for measuring social support in Vietnamese MMT patients. Further studies among methadone patients at different stages of their treatment and among those from different areas of Vietnam are needed.

Indexed as

Social SupportAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesVietnamYoung AdultMethadoneMethadone maintenance treatmentMOS-SSSPsychometric propertySocial supportVietnamese

Identifiers

PMID29444687
PMCPMC5813430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.