Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29444652›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2018

Physical activity and risk of testicular cancer: a systematic review.

Stephanie Huang, Virginia Signal, Diana Sarfati, Caroline Shaw, James Stanley, Katherine McGlynn, Jason Gurney

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical Activity in Cancer Prevention and Survival: A Systematic Review.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie HuangCancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Virginia SignalCancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Diana SarfatiCancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Caroline ShawDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
James StanleyCancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Katherine McGlynnDivision of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.
Jason GurneyCancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. jason.gurney@otago.ac.nz.
University of Otago · NZDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics

Funding

Hormone-Related CancersZIACP010126 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GIERACH, GRETCHEN · 2009 to 2025
$103.5M
Cancer Society of New Zealand (Wellington Division) N/AHealth Research Council of New Zealand 14/052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical activity has been implicated as a risk factor in the development of testicular cancer (TC), but the relationship remains controversial. This systematic review pooled available evidence regarding this association.

methodsUsing Boolean search terms and following PRISMA guidelines, we examined the risk of TC across three categories of exposure: intensity (i.e. comparison of risk between those previously exposed to high, moderate and low levels of physical activity); dose-response (i.e. whether risk of TC increases or decreases with increasing exposure to physical activity); and the role of timing of physical activity (i.e. during early childhood or adolescence).

resultsThirteen studies (11 case-control studies, 2 cohort studies) were included in the review. While some studies have reported a strong protective effect of high levels of physical activity on risk of TC, others have reported either no relationship or a weak direct association; and while a dose-response relationship has been identified across several studies, this relationship has been observed in both directions. Similarly conflicting results exist in terms of individual types of activity and the lifecourse timing of the physical activity. Reasons for this inconsistency may include the absence of any association, heterogeneous assessment of physical activity, misclassification bias and difference in sample sizes.

conclusionsOn balance, there is presently no strong evidence of an association between physical activity and risk of subsequent TC. This review highlights key areas for future investigation that may clarify any association between physical activity and risk of testicular cancer.

Indexed as

ExerciseCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleOdds RatioRecreationRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTesticular NeoplasmsTime FactorsExerciseOccupationPhysical activityRecreationSportTesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID29444652
PMCPMC5813362
OpenAlexW2785526017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.