ArticleNature chemical biology2018
Light-activated chemical probing of nucleobase solvent accessibility inside cells.
Article in Nature chemical biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diverse functional elements in RNA predicted transcriptome-wide by orthogonal RNA structure probing.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Chemical Approaches To Analyzing RNA Structure Transcriptome-Wide.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021Review
- Footprinting SHAPE-eCLIP Reveals Transcriptome-wide Hydrogen Bonds at RNA-Protein Interfaces.Molecular cell · 2020Article
- Targeting RNA in mammalian systems with small molecules.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nchembio.2548.
Identifiers
29443971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.