Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29443879›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2018

Comparison of Rumen and Manure Microbiomes and Implications for the Inoculation of Anaerobic Digesters.

Emine Gozde Ozbayram, Orhan Ince, Bahar Ince, Hauke Harms, Sabine Kleinsteuber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of microbial inoculum optimization on biomethane production from paper mill solid residues.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microbiota and Metabolite Profiles in the Feces of Juvenile Sika Deer (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Emine Gozde OzbayramDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey. gozbayram@itu.edu.tr.
Orhan InceDepartment of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, Maslak, 34469 Istanbul, Turkey. inceor@itu.edu.tr.
Bahar InceInstitute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Bebek, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey. bahar.ince@boun.edu.tr.
Hauke HarmsDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. hauke.harms@ufz.de.
Sabine KleinsteuberDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany. sabine.kleinsteuber@ufz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8643-340X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cattle manure is frequently used as an inoculum for the start-up of agricultural biogas plants or as a co-substrate in the anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic feedstock. Ruminal microbiota are considered to be effective plant fiber degraders, but the microbes contained in manure do not necessarily reflect the rumen microbiome. The aim of this study was to compare the microbial community composition of cow rumen and manure with respect to plant fiber-digesting microbes. Bacterial and methanogenic communities of rumen and manure samples were examined by 454 amplicon sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes and

Indexed as

16S rRNA gene454 amplicon sequencinganaerobic digestionbioaugmentationhydrolytic bacteriamcrA genemethanogenic archaeaplant fiber fermentationruminant microbiome

Identifiers

PMID29443879
PMCPMC5874629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.