ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2018
Chlorhexidine Antiseptic Irrigation Eradicates Staphylococcus epidermidis From Biofilm: An In Vitro Study.
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of global decolonization efficacy with mupirocin nasal drop and chlorhexidine mouthwash in acute leukemia patients: randomized clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Trial
- Bactericidal effects of diluted povidone-iodine on Staphylococcus epidermidis at different stages of biofilm formation on titanium surfaces.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- The Evolution of Symbiosis inBiomolecules · 2026Review
- The Impact of Irrigating Solutions on the Tensile Strength of Silicone Breast Implants: A Comparative In Vitro Analysis for Intraoperative use.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2026Article
- Optimal protocol for intraoperative irrigation to prevent periprosthetic joint infection : an in vitro study.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Effects of common disinfectants on biofilm formation and eradication inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Adjunctive intraoperative pulsed direct current with cefazolin: a rabbit proof-of-concept model for prevention of prosthetic joint infection.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Irrigation Solutions in Wound Care and Breast Surgery: Evidence-Based Applications, Regulatory Considerations, and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing the Effects of Surgical Irrigation Solutions on Human Neutrophil Interactions with NascentMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Measures to Prevent Infection in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Replacements or Upgrades.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- Primary prevention with vaginal chlorhexidine before 16 weeks reduces the incidence of preterm birth: results of the Preterm Labor Prevention Using Vaginal Antiseptics study.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the role of povidone‑iodine in the prevention of surgical site infections.Surgery open science · 2023Review
- The clinical effect of sodium hypochlorite oral rinse on peri-implantitis lesion: A pilot study.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Principles of mechanical and chemical debridement with implant retention.Arthroplasty (London, England) · 2023Review
- Polymeric Nanoparticles as Tunable Nanocarriers for Targeted Delivery of Drugs to Skin Tissues for Treatment of Topical Skin Diseases.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- "Recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) prevention: the European Knee Associates (EKA)-International Committee American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS)-Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA) survey of members".Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022Article
- Assessing the inflammatory response to in vitro polymicrobial wound biofilms in a skin epidermis model.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2022Article
- Irrigation Solutions in Total Joint Arthroplasty.Spartan medical research journal · 2022Article
- Randomised Controlled Trials of Alcohol-Based Surgical Site Skin Preparation for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Optimal concentration of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as an irrigation solution additive to reduce infection rates in rat models of contaminated wound.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntiseptic and antibacterial solutions used for intraoperative irrigation are intended to kill bacteria and thereby decrease the incidence of surgical site infections. It is unknown if the concentrations and exposure times of irrigation solutions commonly used for prophylaxis in clean cases (povidone-iodine 0.35% for 3 minutes) are effective against bacteria in biofilm that are present in implant infections. Currently, povidone-iodine (0.35%), chlorhexidine (0.05%), sodium hypochlorite (0.125%), and triple antibacterial solution are all being used off-label for wound irrigation after surgical débridement for orthopaedic infections. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Do commonly used antibacterials and antiseptics kill bacteria in established biofilm at clinically relevant concentrations and exposure times?
methodsStaphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC#35984) biofilms were exposed to chlorhexidine (0.025%, 0.05%, and 0.1%), povidone-iodine (0.35%, 1.0%, 3.5%, and 10%), sodium hypochlorite (0.125%, 0.25%, and 0.5%,), and triple antibacterial solution (bacitracin 50,000 U/L, gentamicin 80 mg/L, and polymyxin 500,000 U/L) for 1, 5, and 10 minutes in triplicate. Surviving bacteria were detected by 21-day subculture. Failure to eradicate all bacteria in any of the three replicates was considered to be "not effective" for that respective solution, concentration, and exposure time.
resultsChlorhexidine 0.05% and 0.1% at all three exposure times, povidone-iodine 10% at all three exposure times, and povidone-iodine 3.5% at 10 minutes only were effective at eradicating S epidermidis from biofilm. All concentrations and all exposure times of sodium hypochlorite and triple antibacterial solution were not effective.
conclusionsChlorhexidine is capable of eradicating S epidermidis from biofilm in vitro in clinically relevant concentrations and exposure times. Povidone-iodine at commonly used concentrations and exposure times, sodium hypochlorite, and triple antibacterial solutions are not. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This in vitro study suggests that chlorhexidine may be a more effective irrigation solution for S epidermidis in biofilm than other commonly used solutions, such as povidone-iodine, Dakin's solution, and triple antibiotic solution. Clinical outcomes should be studied to determine the most effective antiseptic agent, concentration, and exposure time when intraoperative irrigation is used in the presence of biofilm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.