ArticleMedicine2018
Improved vacuum sealing drainage for treatment of surgical site infection following posterior spinal internal fixation: A case report.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Negative pressure wound therapy in the management of postoperative spinal wound infections: a systematic review.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024Pooled it
- The Role of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy in Patients with Fracture-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal.BioMed research international · 2021Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleSurgical site infection (SSI) following spine surgeries involving internal fixation often require removing the instrument; however, this can cause spinal instability. Previous reports have demonstrated the usefulness of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) therapy, but the cases require wound opening, aseptic condition to replace the VSD device, and a secondary operation to close the wound. Thus, to improve the VSD treatment and develop a maneuverable procedure, make sense in spine surgery. PATIENTS CONCERNS: A 59-year-old male patient with a T12 vertebral fracture was affected by SSIs after spinal osteotomy with internal fixation. DIAGNOSES: The patient complained of wound exudation and had a fever 3 weeks after posterior spinal surgery. Initial serum investigations showed elevated white blood cell count and bacterial cultures of wound exudate were positive for Enterococcus faecalis. Therefore, SSI is confirmed.
interventionsThe infection was not controlled after 2 debridements, so the patient was treated with VSD treatment. The VSD foam dressings containing a drainage tube were placed into the wound from the exudation site of the wound until they contacted the internal fixation devices. After covering external fixation devices, continuous drainage was performed for 24 h. The VSD device was replaced every 4 to 5 days until the wound effusion stopped. All of the operations were performed at the bedside without complex manipulation or secondary closure under harsh aseptic condition. OUTCOMES: Wound exudation decreased remarkably and the infection was controlled 2 weeks after the application of VSD treatment. After 5 weeks, inflammatory indicators all decreased to normal levels and the exudate of the wound had stopped. The VSD treatment was then terminated and the drainage site of the wound was sutured. After 7 weeks, complete wound healing was achieved and no infection recurred during the 6-month follow-up. LESSONS: VSD could be a reliable treatment for SSIs that require preservation of internal fixation. Complete opening of the wound during the VSD treatment and secondary wound closure surgery were avoided.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.