ArticleMedicine2018
Usefulness of the maximum standardized uptake value for the diagnosis and staging of patients with cervical cancer undergoing positron emission tomography/computed tomography.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of preoperative fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT parameters for predicting prognosis of high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer.Nuclear medicine communications · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Pretherapeutic Primary Tumor MTV from [Metabolites · 2021Article
- Study on value of ultrasonic elastography in diagnosis of clinical staging of cervical cancer and efficacy evaluation of radiotherapy.Oncology letters · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer recently has become more common among younger women in Japan. Diagnosing early-stage cancer is straightforward using cervical cytodiagnosis and histological diagnosis. However, postmenopausal endophytic cervical cancer and skip lesions in cervical adenocarcinoma are difficult to detect. We compared the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-fluorodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for primary staging of cervical cancer and evaluated the relationship of the imaging findings to prognosis.This was a retrospective study of 38 patients with cervical cancer who underwent PET/CT. Patients were grouped according to disease stage, and the mean SUVmax, overall survival, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated.The mean SUVmax was significantly different between patients with stage ≤I and ≥II diseases among those with squamous (P > .001) and glandular (P = .023) lesions. With an SUVmax of receiver operating characteristic curves as the optimal cutoff value, the log-rank test for PFS revealed a statistically significant difference between the 2 disease stages (P = .020 and P = .016, respectively).SUVmax is useful to differentiate between stage ≤I and ≥II cervical cancer. SUVmax may be useful for the prognostic evaluation of disease recurrence in patients with cervical cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.