SynthesisMedicine2018
Prognostic significance of pulmonary hypertension in patients with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Combined exercise training decreases blood pressure in OLDER women withEpigenetics · 2024Article
- Pulmonary hypertension associated with lung diseases.The European respiratory journal · 2024Review
- Mxi1-0 Promotes Hypoxic Pulmonary HypertensionFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Current Practices and Potential Nanotechnology Perspectives for Pain Related to Cystic Fibrosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivePulmonary hypertension (PH) is frequently found in advanced parenchymal lung diseases like cystic fibrosis (CF), but the role played by PH in the clinical outcome of CF patients remains unclear. The aim of this study is to determine the influence of PH on survival in the CF population by meta-analysis.
methodsPublications addressing the associations between PH and overall survival (OS) or other clinical characteristics in CF patients were selected from electronic databases. Odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) were used to estimate the association between PH and the clinical characteristics. The hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were abstracted or calculated to evaluate the association between PH and CF survival outcome. Subgroup analyses were also conducted.
resultsSeven studies including 2141 CF patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in our meta-analysis. With respect to clinical features, PH was significantly associated with lower PaO2 (P < .001), higher PaCO2 (P = .02), lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second percent (P < .001) and lower forced vital capacity percent (P < .001). However, PH had no significant impact on CF patients' OS (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.81 to 2.06, P = .283). Furthermore, subgroup analyses also showed no evidence of prognostic role of PH in CF patients (all P values >.05).
conclusionsOur findings suggest that the presence of PH was strongly correlated with worse blood-gas parameters and worse lung function, but surprisingly had no significant prognostic value on survival among CF patients. Further large-scale and prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.