Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29443643›Full record

ReviewSports health

Comprehensive Examination of the Athlete's Shoulder.

Eric J Cotter, Charles P Hannon, David Christian, Rachel M Frank, Bernard R Bach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric J CotterSection of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Charles P HannonSection of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
David ChristianSection of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Rachel M FrankSection of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Bernard R BachSection of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextShoulder pain and dysfunction are common, with patients presenting complaints to both primary and orthopaedic physicians. History and physical examination remain essential to creating a differential diagnosis, even as noninvasive imaging has improved. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature was obtained through keyword searches based on the pathology in question (eg, rotator cuff) and the keywords physical examination using PubMed from January 1, 1980, through September 20, 2017. Additional evidence was obtained through screening references from articles identified through the PubMed searches. STUDY

designClinical review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

resultsA total of 7817 articles were screened for relevance. Several physical examination maneuvers have been described for each specific pathology. The Neer sign has a 75% sensitivity for subacromial impingement (SAI), while the Hawkins-Kennedy test has an 80% sensitivity. The painful arc test has an 80% specificity for SAI. The apprehension test has a hazard ratio of 2.96 for anterior shoulder instability. The Jobe test has a sensitivity of 52.6% and a specificity of 82.4% for full-thickness supraspinatus tears, confirmed on arthroscopy. The lag sign is highly sensitive and specific for combined full-thickness supraspinatus and infraspinatus tears at 97% and 93%, respectively. The Speed test has a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 81% for biceps pathology. The anterior slide test and O'Brien active compression test have been described for superior labrum anterior posterior tears with inconsistent reliability. The cross-body adduction test has a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 79% for acromioclavicular joint pathology.

conclusionSeveral physical examination maneuvers can isolate specific pathology of the shoulder, with widely ranging sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Acromioclavicular JointDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansJoint InstabilityPhysical ExaminationRotator Cuff InjuriesSensitivity and SpecificityShoulder Impingement SyndromeShoulder InjuriesShoulder PainTendon Injuriesacromioclavicular jointbicepsglenoid labrumphysical examinationrotator cuffshoulder

Identifiers

PMID29443643
PMCPMC6044121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.