Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29443582›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2018

Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Cancer.

L B Schmitd, C S Scanlon, N J D'Silva

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 170 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prognostic impact of perineural invasion in oral cancer: a systematic review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L B Schmitd1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
C S Scanlon1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
N J D'Silva1 Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Improving Survival in Oral Cancer by Disruption of Tumor ProgressionR35DE027551 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI D'SILVA, NISHA J · 2017 to 2024
$8.1M
Role of EZH2 in Invasion and Migration in the Oral MucosaR01DE022567 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI D'SILVA, NISHA J · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022567NIDCR NIH HHS R35 DE027551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perineural invasion (PNI) is a mechanism of tumor dissemination that can provide a challenge to tumor eradication and that is correlated with poor survival. Squamous cell carcinoma, the most common type of head and neck cancer, has a high prevalence of PNI. This review provides an overview of clinical studies on the outcomes and factors associated with PNI in head and neck cancer and on findings on cancer-nerve crosstalk.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessPeripheral Nervous System Neoplasmsgalaninmetastasisneoplasm recurrenceneurotrophic factorsprognosissquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID29443582
PMCPMC6728584
OpenAlexW2791039358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.