Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29442362›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2018

A descriptive systematic review of salivary therapeutic drug monitoring in neonates and infants.

Laura Hutchinson, Marlene Sinclair, Bernadette Reid, Kathryn Burnett, Bridgeen Callan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Saliva assay: a call for methodological standardization.Journal of periodontal & implant science · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Use of Antibiotics in Preterm Newborns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura HutchinsonInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK.
Marlene SinclairInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK.
Bernadette ReidInstitute of Nursing and Health Research, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK.
Kathryn BurnettBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK.
Bridgeen CallanBiomedical Sciences Research Institute, Ulster University, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-8299
University of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSaliva, as a matrix, offers many benefits over blood in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), in particular for infantile TDM. However, the accuracy of salivary TDM in infants remains an area of debate. This review explored the accuracy, applicability and advantages of using saliva TDM in infants and neonates.

methodsDatabases were searched up to and including September 2016. Studies were included based on PICO as follows: P: infants and neonates being treated with any medication, I: salivary TDM vs. C: traditional methods and O: accuracy, advantages/disadvantages and applicability to practice. Compounds were assessed by their physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties, as well as published quantitative saliva monitoring data.

resultsTwenty-four studies and their respective 13 compounds were investigated. Four neutral and two acidic compounds, oxcarbazepine, primidone, fluconazole, busulfan, theophylline and phenytoin displayed excellent/very good correlation between blood plasma and saliva. Lamotrigine was the only basic compound to show excellent correlation with morphine exhibiting no correlation between saliva and blood plasma. Any compound with an acid dissociation constant (pKa) within physiological range (pH 6-8) gave a more varied response.

conclusionThere is significant potential for infantile saliva testing and in particular for neutral and weakly acidic compounds. Of the properties investigated, pKa was the most influential with both logP and protein binding having little effect on this correlation. To conclude, any compound with a pKa within physiological range (pH 6-8) should be considered with extra care, with the extraction and analysis method examined and optimized on a case-by-case basis.

Indexed as

Age FactorsDrug MonitoringHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSalivaPharmaceutical Preparationsinfantspaediatricpharmacokinetic parametersphysicochemical propertiessalivasystematic reviewtherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID29442362
PMCPMC5980545
OpenAlexW2790243793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.