ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018
Open reduction and fixation with a locking plate without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome of Osteosynthesis of Late-Presenting Proximal Humerus Non-union: A Case Series.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2024Article
- Repair of proximal humerus fracture nonunions using a standardized treatment algorithm: a case series.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aim of the studyThe aim of this study was to evaluate union rate and clinical outcome in patients with proximal humeral nonunions treated by open reduction and locking plate fixation without bone grafting.
methodsFrom 2011 to 2016, nine patients were treated using open reduction and locking plate stabilization without bone grafting. They were examined both clinically and radiologically, with a mean follow-up period of 31 months. Outcome was evaluated using pain and range of motion (ROM) parameters. In addition, self-assessment by patients was registered on the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, Constant-Murley Score, Oxford Shoulder Score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form. A CT scan of the shoulder was performed to analyze union.
resultsAt checkup, all patients showed union in the CT scans, where the mean ROM in abduction was 139° (SD 50°), in adduction 39° (SD 8°), in forward flexion 136° (SD 40°), in extension 44° (SD 11°), in internal rotation 62° (SD 15°), and external rotation 54° (SD 31°). ROM improved significantly in all planes of motion, except for adduction, post-surgery (p < 0.05). Plate removal was necessary in three patients. No complications were reported.
conclusionOpen reduction and locking plate fixation without bone grafting is a reasonable and safe option for treating proximal humerus nonunion. It leads to a high union rate, significant improvement in ROM, and in the majority of the cases to an "excellent" and "good" functional outcome without an increased risk of complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.