Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29441476›Full record

SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Augmented Renal Clearance in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review.

Idoia Bilbao-Meseguer, Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón, Helena Barrasa, Arantxazu Isla, María Ángeles Solinís

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 228 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Brain-kidney crosstalk in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Idoia Bilbao-MeseguerDepartment of Pharmacy, Cruces University Hospital, Plaza de Cruces 12, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Alicia Rodríguez-GascónPharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Lascaray Research Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad, 7, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Helena BarrasaIntensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Alava, c/ Olaguibel no 29, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Arantxazu IslaPharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Lascaray Research Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad, 7, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. arantxa.isla@ehu.eus.
María Ángeles SolinísPharmacokinetic, Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy Group (PharmaNanoGene), Faculty of Pharmacy, Lascaray Research Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Paseo de la Universidad, 7, 01006, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain. marian.solinis@ehu.eus.ORCID 0000-0001-9127-0775
University of the Basque Country · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital Universitario Araba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditionally, renal function in critically ill patients has been assessed to identify renal dysfunction, and dose adjustment is generally accepted in such a context. Nevertheless, augmented renal clearance (ARC) is a less well-studied phenomenon that could lead to faster elimination of drugs, resulting in subtherapeutic concentrations and poorer clinical outcomes when standard dosage guidelines are followed.

objectiveThe aim of this systematic review was to gather and summarise all the available evidence on ARC in critically ill patients, including its definition, underlying mechanisms, epidemiology, diagnosis and impact on both drug pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes.

methodA systematic review was conducted to include all the original studies that provided information on ARC in critically ill patients, and is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

resultsAugmented renal clearance, defined as a creatinine clearance (CrCl) > 130 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionARC is a prevalent condition in critically ill patients, especially in young people, with urinary CrCl being the best diagnostic method because mathematical estimates tend to underestimate CrCl. ARC increases renal drug elimination and has a clear influence on certain antimicrobial plasma levels, but is yet to define its impact on clinical outcomes and on pharmacokinetics of other types of drugs. Research on the need to stage ARC and establish specific dosing guidelines is warranted.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessRenal EliminationAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansKidneyKidney Function TestsRisk FactorsTrauma Severity IndicesWounds and InjuriesAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29441476
OpenAlexW2786832455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.