ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2018
Diagnostic Error in Stroke-Reasons and Proposed Solutions.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Atypical Presentations at Risk for Diagnostic Errors in Internal Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- Factors associated with missed stroke diagnosis in prehospital triage: a single-center cohort study.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- The Absence of Typical Stroke Symptoms and Risk Factors Represents the Greatest Risk of an Incorrect Diagnosis in Stroke Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Stroke and liminality: narratives of reconfiguring identity after stroke and their implications for person-centred stroke care.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Article
- Frequency and Characteristics of Non-Neurological and Neurological Stroke Mimics in the Emergency Department.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in radiology.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Diagnostic accuracy of telestroke consultation: a Louisiana based tele-network experience.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Error in Neuro-ophthalmology: Avenues to Improve.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2022Review
- Co-creating Digital Stories With UK-Based Stroke Survivors With the Aim of Synthesizing Collective Lessons From Individual Experiences of Interacting With Healthcare Professionals.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Analyzing diagnostic errors in the acute setting: a process-driven approach.Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy in Teleneurological Stroke Consultations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Diagnostic Errors in Initial Misdiagnosis of Optic Nerve Sheath Meningiomas.JAMA neurology · 2019Article
- Diagnostic error and neuro-ophthalmology.Current opinion in neurology · 2019Review
- Errors in the Diagnosis of Stroke-Tales of Common Stroke Mimics and Strokes in Hiding.Annals of Indian Academy of NeurologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe discuss the frequency of stroke misdiagnosis and identify subgroups of stroke at high risk for specific diagnostic errors. In addition, we review common reasons for misdiagnosis and propose solutions to decrease error. RECENT
findingsAccording to a recent report by the National Academy of Medicine, most people in the USA are likely to experience a diagnostic error during their lifetimes. Nearly half of such errors result in serious disability and death. Stroke misdiagnosis is a major health care concern, with initial misdiagnosis estimated to occur in 9% of all stroke patients in the emergency setting. Under- or missed diagnosis (false negative) of stroke can result in adverse patient outcomes due to the preclusion of acute treatments and failure to initiate secondary prevention strategies. On the other hand, the overdiagnosis of stroke can result in inappropriate treatment, delayed identification of actual underlying disease, and increased health care costs. Young patients, women, minorities, and patients presenting with non-specific, transient, or posterior circulation stroke symptoms are at increased risk of misdiagnosis. Strategies to decrease diagnostic error in stroke have largely focused on early stroke detection via bedside examination strategies and a clinical decision rules. Targeted interventions to improve the diagnostic accuracy of stroke diagnosis among high-risk groups as well as symptom-specific clinical decision supports are needed. There are a number of open questions in the study of stroke misdiagnosis. To improve patient outcomes, existing strategies to improve stroke diagnostic accuracy should be more broadly adopted and novel interventions devised and tested to reduce diagnostic errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29441421What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.