Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29441228›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2018

A gene expression-based risk model reveals prognosis of gastric cancer.

Xiaorong Deng, Qun Xiao, Feng Liu, Cihua Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [Expression of PSMA 7 and its effect on proliferation, invasion, migration and tumorigenesis of gastric cancer].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaorong Deng *Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Qun Xiao *Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuzhou, Hunan, China.
Feng Liu *Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Cihua ZhengJiangxi Medical College of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of gastric cancer is difficult to determine, although clinical indicators provide valuable evidence.

methodsIn this study, using screened biomarkers of gastric cancer in combination with random forest variable hunting and multivariable Cox regression, a risk score model was developed to predict the survival of gastric cancer. Survival difference between high/low-risk groups were compared. The relationship between risk score and other clinicopathological indicators was evaluated. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was used to identify pathways associated with risk scores.

resultsThe patients with high risk scores (median overall survival: 20.2 months, 95% CI [16.9-26.0] months) tend to exhibit early events compared with those with low risk scores (median survival: 70.0 months, 95% CI [46.9-101] months,

conclusionThe risk score model successfully predicted the survival of 1,294 gastric cancer samples from four independent datasets and is among the most important indicators in clinical clinicopathological information for the prognosis of gastric cancer. To our knowledge, it is the first report to predict the survival of gastric cancer using optimized expression panel.

Indexed as

Gatric cancerModelPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID29441228
PMCPMC5807894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.