ArticleKorean journal of anesthesiology2018
A comparison of i-gel™ and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ during general anesthesia in infants.
Article in Korean journal of anesthesiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03748589 (Application of I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Application of I-gel Laryngeal Mask Airway in Infants and Children Undergoing Surgical Procedures
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the standard and triple airway maneuvering techniques for i-gel™ placement in patients undergoing elective surgery: a randomized controlled study.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Trial
- Comparison of clinical performance of i-gelⓇ and Baska MaskⓇ during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2019Trial
- Conditions for Insertion of the Laryngeal Mask Airway in an Innovative Method vs the Classic Method.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Clinical performance of Ambu AuraGainAnesthesia and pain medicine · 2020Article
- Anesthetic management of an infant with Pierre Robin sequence undergoing tracheostomy using an i-gel™.JA clinical reports · 2019Article
- A comparison of supraglottic devices in pediatric patients.Medical devices (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2018Article
- Adverse Events in Infants Less Than 6 Months of Age After Ambulatory Surgery and Diagnostic Imaging Requiring Anesthesia.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe i-gel™ (i-gel) and Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ (LMA Supreme) have been safely used in children. We compared the airway performance of the i-gel and LMA Supreme in infants undergoing general anesthesia.
methodsSixty infants with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were randomly assigned to place either the i-gel or the LMA Supreme. The size 1 or 1.5 of each airway was selected by the weight of infants. The primary outcome variable was oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP). We also assessed insertion success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic view of the larynx, airway quality, airway manipulations, and perioperative complications.
resultsDemographic data did not differ between the two groups. Insertion success rate was similar in both groups. OLP for the i-gel (26.0 ± 3.8 cmH
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that the i-gel and LMA Supreme provided a similar performance of airway in infants. Compared with the LMA Supreme, the i-gel provided shorter insertion time and higher OLP in infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.