Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29441119›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2018

Diagnosis, monitoring and prevention of exposure-related non-communicable diseases in the living and working environment: DiMoPEx-project is designed to determine the impacts of environmental exposure on human health.

Lygia Therese Budnik, Balazs Adam, Maria Albin, Barbara Banelli, Xaver Baur, Fiorella Belpoggi, Claudia Bolognesi, Karin Broberg, Per Gustavsson, Thomas Göen and 15 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Use of Genomic Information in Health Impact Assessment is Yet to Come: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Lygia Therese Budnik1Division of Translational Toxicology and Immunology, Institute for Occupational and Maritime Medicine (ZfAM), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Balazs Adam2Faculty of Public Health, Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Maria Albin3Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
Barbara Banelli5Tumor Epigenetics Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS and University of Genoa, DISSAL, Genoa, Italy.
Xaver BaurEuropean Society for Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Fiorella BelpoggiCesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, Ramazzini Institute, Bentivoglio, Bologna, Italy.
Claudia Bolognesi8San Martino-IST Environmental Carcinogenesis Unit, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, National Cancer Institute, Genoa, Italy.
Karin Broberg4Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Stockholm, Sweden.
Per Gustavsson4Karolinska Institutet, Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), Stockholm, Sweden.
Thomas Göen9Social and Environmental Medicine, Institute and Outpatient Clinic of Occupational, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nurnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Axel Fischer10Institute of Occupational Medicine, Charité Universitäts Medizin, Berlin, Germany.
Dorota JarosinskaWHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn, Germany.
Fabiana ManservisiCesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, Ramazzini Institute, Bentivoglio, Bologna, Italy.
Richard O'Kennedy12Biomedical Diagnostics Institute, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
Johan Øvrevik13Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Elizabet PaunovicWHO European Centre for Environment and Health, Bonn, Germany.
Beate Ritz14Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, Fielding School of Public Health (FSPH), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, USA.
Paul T J Scheepers15Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboudumc (Radboud university medical center), Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Vivi SchlünssenNational Research Center for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Heidi Schwarzenbach18Department of Tumor Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg, Germany.
Per E Schwarze13Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Orla SheilsDepartment of Histopathology, Central Pathology Laboratory, St James's Hospital, Trinity translational Medicine Institute, Dublin, Ireland.
Torben Sigsgaard17Department of Public Health, Section Environment, Occupation & Health & Danish Ramazzini Centre Aarhus, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Karel Van Damme20Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ludwine Casteleyn20Center for Human Genetics, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The WHO has ranked environmental hazardous exposures in the living and working environment among the top risk factors for chronic disease mortality. Worldwide, about 40 million people die each year from noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) including cancer, diabetes, and chronic cardiovascular, neurological and lung diseases. The exposure to ambient pollution in the living and working environment is exacerbated by individual susceptibilities and lifestyle-driven factors to produce complex and complicated NCD etiologies. Research addressing the links between environmental exposure and disease prevalence is key for prevention of the pandemic increase in NCD morbidity and mortality. However, the long latency, the chronic course of some diseases and the necessity to address cumulative exposures over very long periods does mean that it is often difficult to identify causal environmental exposures. EU-funded COST Action DiMoPEx is developing new concepts for a better understanding of health-environment (including gene-environment) interactions in the etiology of NCDs. The overarching idea is to teach and train scientists and physicians to learn how to include efficient and valid exposure assessments in their research and in their clinical practice in current and future cooperative projects. DiMoPEx partners have identified some of the emerging research needs, which include the lack of evidence-based exposure data and the need for human-equivalent animal models mirroring human lifespan and low-dose cumulative exposures. Utilizing an interdisciplinary approach incorporating seven working groups, DiMoPEx will focus on aspects of air pollution with particulate matter including dust and fibers and on exposure to low doses of solvents and sensitizing agents. Biomarkers of early exposure and their associated effects as indicators of disease-derived information will be tested and standardized within individual projects. Risks arising from some NCDs, like pneumoconioses, cancers and allergies, are predictable and preventable. Consequently, preventative action could lead to decreasing disease morbidity and mortality for many of the NCDs that are of major public concern. DiMoPEx plans to catalyze and stimulate interaction of scientists with policy-makers in attacking these exposure-related diseases.

Indexed as

Environmental/occupational exposure to xenobioticsHuman biomonitoringNoncommunicable diseases

Identifiers

PMID29441119
PMCPMC5800006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.