ArticleThe Journal of antibiotics2018
Anti-Helicobacter pylori activities of selected N-substituted cinnamamide derivatives evaluated on reference and clinical bacterial strains.
Article in The Journal of antibiotics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Curcumin-stabilized silver nanoparticles target the Helicobacter pylori-tumor interface in gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- New Quipazine Derivatives Active Against Drug-Resistant OncogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Discovery of Cinnamic Acid Derivatives as Potent Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, thirty-five N-substituted derivatives of cinnamic acid amide (cinnamamide) were evaluated for anti-Helicobacter pylori activity using an agar disc-diffusion method. Qualitative screening was performed on a reference H. pylori strain (ATCC 43504), resulting in the identification of the three most active compounds, 8 (R,S-(2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxypropyl)prop-2-enamide, minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC = 7.5 µg/mL), 23 ((2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(2-hydroxycyclohexyl)prop-2-enamide, MIC = 10 µg/mL), and 28 ((2E)-3-(4-chlorophenyl)-N-(4-oxocyclohexyl)prop-2-enamide, MIC = 10 µg/mL). These compounds were further tested on twelve well-characterized clinical strains, yielding MIC values that ranged from 10 to 1000 µg/mL. Preliminary safety assessments of the compounds were made using the MTT viability test for cytotoxicity and Ames test for mutagenicity, which showed them to be generally safe, although compounds 8 and 28 showed mutagenic activity at some of the tested concentrations. The results of this study showed the anti-H. pylori potential of cinnamamide derivatives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29440770What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.