ArticleScientific reports2018
Time-reversed magnetically controlled perturbation (TRMCP) optical focusing inside scattering media.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance enhancement in wavefront shaping of multiply scattered light: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Wavefront shaping improves the transparency of the scattering media: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Review
- Wavefront shaping: A versatile tool to conquer multiple scattering in multidisciplinary fields.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2022Review
- Single-shot time-reversed optical focusing into and through scattering media.ACS photonics · 2020Article
- Fighting against fast speckle decorrelation for light focusing inside live tissue by photon frequency shifting.ACS photonics · 2020Article
- Intelligently optimized digital optical phase conjugation with particle swarm optimization.Optics letters · 2020Article
- Focusing light inside live tissue using reversibly switchable bacterial phytochrome as a genetically encoded photochromic guide star.Science advances · 2019Article
- Angular-spectrum modeling of focusing light inside scattering media by optical phase conjugation.Optica · 2019Article
- Implementation of digital optical phase conjugation with embedded calibration and phase rectification.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Manipulating and focusing light deep inside biological tissue and tissue-like complex media has been desired for long yet considered challenging. One feasible strategy is through optical wavefront engineering, where the optical scattering-induced phase distortions are time reversed or pre-compensated so that photons travel along different optical paths interfere constructively at the targeted position within a scattering medium. To define the targeted position, an internal guidestar is needed to guide or provide a feedback for wavefront engineering. It could be injected or embedded probes such as fluorescence or nonlinear microspheres, ultrasonic modulation, as well as absorption perturbation. Here we propose to use a magnetically controlled optical absorbing microsphere as the internal guidestar. Using a digital optical phase conjugation system, we obtained sharp optical focusing within scattering media through time-reversing the scattered light perturbed by the magnetic microsphere. Since the object is magnetically controlled, dynamic optical focusing is allowed with a relatively large field-of-view by scanning the magnetic field externally. Moreover, the magnetic microsphere can be packaged with an organic membrane, using biological or chemical means to serve as a carrier. Therefore, the technique may find particular applications for enhanced targeted drug delivery, and imaging and photoablation of angiogenic vessels in tumours.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.